Search Results for author:
Found 9 papers, 1 papers with code
Stable Normative Explanations: From Argumentation to Deontic Logic
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation.
Modelling and Explaining Legal Case-based Reasoners through Classifiers
In this paper we combine the modal logic approach (binary-input classifier, BLC) to classifiers and their explanations given by Liu & Lorini (2021) with Horty's account of factor-based CBR, since both a classifier and CBR map sets of features to decisions or classifications.
Deontic Meta-Rules
First, we introduce and formalise two variants of Defeasible Deontic Logic with Meta-Rules to represent (1) defeasible meta-theories with deontic modalities, and (2) two different types of conflicts among rules: Simple Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic, and Cautious Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic.
Avoiding Pragmatic Oddity: A Bottom-up Defeasible Deontic Logic
This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem.
Is Free Choice Permission Admissible in Classical Deontic Logic?
In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations.
Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains
In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains.
A Labelling Framework for Probabilistic Argumentation
The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities.
The Rationale behind the Concept of Goal
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like desire, goal and intention are just facets of the broader notion of (acceptable) outcome.
Strategic Argumentation is NP-Complete
In this paper we study the complexity of strategic argumentation for dialogue games.
