no code implementations • 14 Sep 2020 • Baris Göktepe, Tatiana Rykova, Thomas Fehrenbach, Thomas Schierl, Cornelius Hellge
Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed protocol clearly outperforms the classical proactive HARQ in all scenarios when taking a processing delay reduction due to the less complex prediction approach into account, achieving an energy efficiency gain in the range of 11% up to 15% for very stringent latency budgets of 1 ms at $10^{-2}$ BLER and from 4% up to 7. 5% for less stringent latency budgets of 2 ms at $10^{-3}$ BLER.
