no code implementations • IJCNLP 2019 • Artur Kulmizev, Miryam de Lhoneux, Johannes Gontrum, Elena Fano, Joakim Nivre
Transition-based and graph-based dependency parsers have previously been shown to have complementary strengths and weaknesses: transition-based parsers exploit rich structural features but suffer from error propagation, while graph-based parsers benefit from global optimization but have restricted feature scope.
no code implementations • 20 Aug 2019 • Artur Kulmizev, Miryam de Lhoneux, Johannes Gontrum, Elena Fano, Joakim Nivre
Transition-based and graph-based dependency parsers have previously been shown to have complementary strengths and weaknesses: transition-based parsers exploit rich structural features but suffer from error propagation, while graph-based parsers benefit from global optimization but have restricted feature scope.