Search Results for author:
Found 3 papers, 2 papers with code
Q^{2}: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answering
Neural knowledge-grounded generative models for dialogue often produce content that is factually inconsistent with the knowledge they rely on, making them unreliable and limiting their applicability.
Abstractive Text Summarization
Natural Language Inference
+3
DisentQA: Disentangling Parametric and Contextual Knowledge with Counterfactual Question Answering
Question answering models commonly have access to two sources of "knowledge" during inference time: (1) parametric knowledge - the factual knowledge encoded in the model weights, and (2) contextual knowledge - external knowledge (e. g., a Wikipedia passage) given to the model to generate a grounded answer.
$Q^{2}$: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answering
Neural knowledge-grounded generative models for dialogue often produce content that is factually inconsistent with the knowledge they rely on, making them unreliable and limiting their applicability.
