no code implementations • 10 May 2013 • Ricardo Fabbri, Ivan N. Bastos, Francisco D. Moura Neto, Francisco J. P. Lopes, Wesley N. Goncalves, Odemir M. Bruno
An excellent classification rate was obtained, at a success rate of 90%, 80%, and 83% for low (cathodic), high (anodic), and both potential ranges, respectively, using only 2% of the original profile data.