Search Results for author: Julia Schnabel

Found 7 papers, 3 papers with code

DinoBloom: A Foundation Model for Generalizable Cell Embeddings in Hematology

2 code implementations7 Apr 2024 Valentin Koch, Sophia J. Wagner, Salome Kazeminia, Ece Sancar, Matthias Hehr, Julia Schnabel, Tingying Peng, Carsten Marr

In hematology, computational models offer significant potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and reduce the tedious work of analyzing single cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow smears.

Multiple Instance Learning Transfer Learning

Towards Learning Contrast Kinetics with Multi-Condition Latent Diffusion Models

1 code implementation20 Mar 2024 Richard Osuala, Daniel Lang, Preeti Verma, Smriti Joshi, Apostolia Tsirikoglou, Grzegorz Skorupko, Kaisar Kushibar, Lidia Garrucho, Walter H. L. Pinaya, Oliver Diaz, Julia Schnabel, Karim Lekadir

Contrast agents in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging allow to localize tumors and observe their contrast kinetics, which is essential for cancer characterization and respective treatment decision-making.

Decision Making Image Generation +1

Sparse annotation strategies for segmentation of short axis cardiac MRI

no code implementations24 Jul 2023 Josh Stein, Maxime Di Folco, Julia Schnabel

Further, annotating slices from the middle of volumes yields the most beneficial results in terms of segmentation performance, and the apical region the worst.

Data Augmentation Few-Shot Learning +3

A Variational Bayesian Method for Similarity Learning in Non-Rigid Image Registration

1 code implementation CVPR 2022 Daniel Grzech, Mohammad Farid Azampour, Ben Glocker, Julia Schnabel, Nassir Navab, Bernhard Kainz, Loïc le Folgoc

We propose a novel variational Bayesian formulation for diffeomorphic non-rigid registration of medical images, which learns in an unsupervised way a data-specific similarity metric.

Image Registration

Is MC Dropout Bayesian?

no code implementations8 Oct 2021 Loic Le Folgoc, Vasileios Baltatzis, Sujal Desai, Anand Devaraj, Sam Ellis, Octavio E. Martinez Manzanera, Arjun Nair, Huaqi Qiu, Julia Schnabel, Ben Glocker

We question the properties of MC Dropout for approximate inference, as in fact MC Dropout changes the Bayesian model; its predictive posterior assigns $0$ probability to the true model on closed-form benchmarks; the multimodality of its predictive posterior is not a property of the true predictive posterior but a design artefact.

Uncertainty Quantification Variational Inference

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.