no code implementations • insights (ACL) 2022 • Ionut Sorodoc, Laura Aina, Gemma Boleda
To successfully account for language, computational models need to take into account both the linguistic context (the content of the utterances) and the extra-linguistic context (for instance, the participants in a dialogue).
no code implementations • 21 Oct 2022 • Laura Aina, Nikos Voskarides, Roi Blanco
Interestingly, we find that prompting combined with KD can reduce compute and data cost at the same time.
1 code implementation • CoNLL (EMNLP) 2021 • Laura Aina, Xixian Liao, Gemma Boleda, Matthijs Westera
It is often posited that more predictable parts of a speaker's meaning tend to be made less explicit, for instance using shorter, less informative words.
no code implementations • EMNLP (BlackboxNLP) 2021 • Laura Aina, Tal Linzen
Temporary syntactic ambiguities arise when the beginning of a sentence is compatible with multiple syntactic analyses.
1 code implementation • ACL 2019 • Laura Aina, Kristina Gulordava, Gemma Boleda
In neural network models of language, words are commonly represented using context-invariant representations (word embeddings) which are then put in context in the hidden layers.
1 code implementation • NAACL 2019 • Laura Aina, Carina Silberer, Matthijs Westera, Ionut-Teodor Sorodoc, Gemma Boleda
In this paper we analyze the behavior of two recently proposed entity-centric models in a referential task, Entity Linking in Multi-party Dialogue (SemEval 2018 Task 4).
no code implementations • EMNLP 2018 • Kristina Gulordava, Laura Aina, Gemma Boleda
Recent state-of-the-art neural language models share the representations of words given by the input and output mappings.
1 code implementation • SEMEVAL 2018 • Laura Aina, Carina Silberer, Ionut-Teodor Sorodoc, Matthijs Westera, Gemma Boleda
This paper describes our winning contribution to SemEval 2018 Task 4: Character Identification on Multiparty Dialogues.