Search Results for author: Meike Zehlike

Found 7 papers, 2 papers with code

Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions

no code implementations29 Jan 2022 Gourab K Patro, Lorenzo Porcaro, Laura Mitchell, Qiuyue Zhang, Meike Zehlike, Nikhil Garg

Ranking, recommendation, and retrieval systems are widely used in online platforms and other societal systems, including e-commerce, media-streaming, admissions, gig platforms, and hiring.

Fairness Retrieval

Fairness in Ranking: A Survey

no code implementations25 Mar 2021 Meike Zehlike, Ke Yang, Julia Stoyanovich

In this survey, we describe four classification frameworks for fairness-enhancing interventions, along which we relate the technical methods surveyed in this paper, discuss evaluation datasets, and present technical work on fairness in score-based ranking.

Fairness Information Retrieval +4

A Note on the Significance Adjustment for FA*IR with Two Protected Groups

no code implementations23 Dec 2020 Meike Zehlike, Tom Sühr, Carlos Castillo

In this report we provide an improvement of the significance adjustment from the FA*IR algorithm of Zehlike et al., which did not work for very short rankings in combination with a low minimum proportion $p$ for the protected group.

Position

FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Results

no code implementations27 May 2019 Meike Zehlike, Tom Sühr, Carlos Castillo, Ivan Kitanovski

We implement two algorithms from the fair ranking literature, namely FA*IR (Zehlike et al., 2017) and DELTR (Zehlike and Castillo, 2018) and provide them as stand-alone libraries in Python and Java.

Fairness

Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approach

8 code implementations22 May 2018 Meike Zehlike, Carlos Castillo

Ranked search results have become the main mechanism by which we find content, products, places, and people online.

Information Retrieval Computers and Society H.3.3

Matching Code and Law: Achieving Algorithmic Fairness with Optimal Transport

no code implementations21 Dec 2017 Meike Zehlike, Philipp Hacker, Emil Wiedemann

As a consequence, the algorithm enables the decision maker to adopt intermediate ``worldviews'' on the degree of discrimination encoded in algorithmic processes, adding nuance to the extreme cases of ``we're all equal'' (WAE) and ``what you see is what you get'' (WYSIWYG) proposed so far in the literature.

Fairness

FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm

2 code implementations20 Jun 2017 Meike Zehlike, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Sara Hajian, Mohamed Megahed, Ricardo Baeza-Yates

In this work, we define and solve the Fair Top-k Ranking problem, in which we want to determine a subset of k candidates from a large pool of n >> k candidates, maximizing utility (i. e., select the "best" candidates) subject to group fairness criteria.

Fairness

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.