Search Results for author: Ravi Narayanaswami

Found 6 papers, 1 papers with code

Google Neural Network Models for Edge Devices: Analyzing and Mitigating Machine Learning Inference Bottlenecks

no code implementations29 Sep 2021 Amirali Boroumand, Saugata Ghose, Berkin Akin, Ravi Narayanaswami, Geraldo F. Oliveira, Xiaoyu Ma, Eric Shiu, Onur Mutlu

To understand how edge ML accelerators perform, we characterize the performance of a commercial Google Edge TPU, using 24 Google edge NN models (which span a wide range of NN model types) and analyzing each NN layer within each model.

Edge-computing Face Detection +3

Mitigating Edge Machine Learning Inference Bottlenecks: An Empirical Study on Accelerating Google Edge Models

no code implementations1 Mar 2021 Amirali Boroumand, Saugata Ghose, Berkin Akin, Ravi Narayanaswami, Geraldo F. Oliveira, Xiaoyu Ma, Eric Shiu, Onur Mutlu

We comprehensively study the characteristics of each NN layer in all of the Google edge models, and find that these shortcomings arise from the one-size-fits-all approach of the accelerator, as there is a high amount of heterogeneity in key layer characteristics both across different models and across different layers in the same model.

BIG-bench Machine Learning Edge-computing

An Evaluation of Edge TPU Accelerators for Convolutional Neural Networks

1 code implementation20 Feb 2021 Kiran Seshadri, Berkin Akin, James Laudon, Ravi Narayanaswami, Amir Yazdanbakhsh

Then, we extensively evaluate three classes of Edge TPUs, covering different computing ecosystems, that are either currently deployed in Google products or are the product pipeline, across 423K unique convolutional neural networks.

Apollo: Transferable Architecture Exploration

no code implementations2 Feb 2021 Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Christof Angermueller, Berkin Akin, Yanqi Zhou, Albin Jones, Milad Hashemi, Kevin Swersky, Satrajit Chatterjee, Ravi Narayanaswami, James Laudon

We further show that by transferring knowledge between target architectures with different design constraints, Apollo is able to find optimal configurations faster and often with better objective value (up to 25% improvements).

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.