Search Results for author: Richard Booth

Found 9 papers, 0 papers with code

Who's the Expert? On Multi-source Belief Change

no code implementations29 Apr 2022 Joseph Singleton, Richard Booth

A group of information sources gives a sequence of reports about the state of the world at various instances (e. g. different points in time).

Revision by Conditionals: From Hook to Arrow

no code implementations29 Jun 2020 Jake Chandler, Richard Booth

The belief revision literature has largely focussed on the issue of how to revise one's beliefs in the light of information regarding matters of fact.

Elementary Iterated Revision and the Levi Identity

no code implementations2 Jul 2019 Jake Chandler, Richard Booth

We close the paper by discussing the general prospects for defining iterated revision in terms of iterated contraction.

On Rational Entailment for Propositional Typicality Logic

no code implementations28 Sep 2018 Richard Booth, Giovanni Casini, Thomas Meyer, Ivan Varzinczak

Propositional Typicality Logic (PTL) is a recently proposed logic, obtained by enriching classical propositional logic with a typicality operator capturing the most typical (alias normal or conventional) situations in which a given sentence holds.

Sentence

On Strengthening the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision: Proper Ordinal Interval Operators

no code implementations26 Jul 2018 Richard Booth, Jake Chandler

In this paper, we supplement both the DP postulates and (P) with a number of novel conditions.

Relation

Extending the Harper Identity to Iterated Belief Change

no code implementations19 Apr 2016 Jake Chandler, Richard Booth

The field of iterated belief change has focused mainly on revision, with the other main operator of AGM belief change theory, i. e. contraction, receiving relatively little attention.

Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming

no code implementations15 Jul 2014 Richard Booth, Dov Gabbay, Souhila Kaci, Tjitze Rienstra, Leendert van der Torre

We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes to an argumentation framework act as hypotheses to explain the support of an observation.

Abstract Argumentation

Judgment Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation

no code implementations26 May 2014 Edmond Awad, Richard Booth, Fernando Tohme, Iyad Rahwan

After characterising the sufficient and necessary conditions for satisfying collective rationality, we study whether restricting the domain of argument-wise plurality voting to classical semantics allows us to escape the impossibility result.

On the Link between Partial Meet, Kernel, and Infra Contraction and its Application to Horn Logic

no code implementations16 Jan 2014 Richard Booth, Thomas Meyer, Ivan Varzinczak, Renata Wassermann

The use of belief bases to obtain this result provides evidence for the conjecture that Horn belief change is best viewed as a hybrid version of belief set change and belief base change.

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.