Search Results for author: Taylor L. Bobrow

Found 5 papers, 1 papers with code

Colonoscopy 3D Video Dataset with Paired Depth from 2D-3D Registration

no code implementations17 Jun 2022 Taylor L. Bobrow, Mayank Golhar, Rohan Vijayan, Venkata S. Akshintala, Juan R. Garcia, Nicholas J. Durr

In this work, we present a Colonoscopy 3D Video Dataset (C3VD) acquired with a high definition clinical colonoscope and high-fidelity colon models for benchmarking computer vision methods in colonoscopy.

Benchmarking Depth Estimation +4

GAN Inversion for Data Augmentation to Improve Colonoscopy Lesion Classification

no code implementations4 May 2022 Mayank Golhar, Taylor L. Bobrow, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Nicholas J. Durr

This study demonstrates that synthetic colonoscopy images generated by Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) inversion can be used as training data to improve the lesion classification performance of deep learning models.

Classification Data Augmentation +3

Improving colonoscopy lesion classification using semi-supervised deep learning

no code implementations7 Sep 2020 Mayank Golhar, Taylor L. Bobrow, MirMilad Pourmousavi Khoshknab, Simran Jit, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Nicholas J. Durr

While data-driven approaches excel at many image analysis tasks, the performance of these approaches is often limited by a shortage of annotated data available for training.

Classification Domain Adaptation +3

SLAM Endoscopy enhanced by adversarial depth prediction

no code implementations29 Jun 2019 Richard J. Chen, Taylor L. Bobrow, Thomas Athey, Faisal Mahmood, Nicholas J. Durr

Medical endoscopy remains a challenging application for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) due to the sparsity of image features and size constraints that prevent direct depth-sensing.

Depth Prediction Monocular Depth Estimation +1

DeepLSR: a deep learning approach for laser speckle reduction

2 code implementations23 Oct 2018 Taylor L. Bobrow, Faisal Mahmood, Miguel Inserni, Nicholas J. Durr

In images of gastrointestinal tissues, DeepLSR reduces laser speckle noise by 6. 4 dB, compared to a 2. 9 dB reduction from optimized non-local means processing, a 3. 0 dB reduction from BM3D, and a 3. 7 dB reduction from an optical speckle reducer utilizing an oscillating diffuser.

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.