Search Results for author:
Found 4 papers, 1 papers with code
Combiner and HyperCombiner Networks: Rules to Combine Multimodality MR Images for Prostate Cancer Localisation
One of the distinct characteristics in radiologists' reading of multiparametric prostate MR scans, using reporting systems such as PI-RADS v2. 1, is to score individual types of MR modalities, T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced, and then combine these image-modality-specific scores using standardised decision rules to predict the likelihood of clinically significant cancer.
Bi-parametric prostate MR image synthesis using pathology and sequence-conditioned stable diffusion
For the first time, we evaluate the realism of the generated pathology by blind expert identification of the presence of suspected lesions, where we find that the clinician performs similarly for both real and synthesised images, with a 2. 9 percentage point difference in lesion identification accuracy between real and synthesised images, demonstrating the potentials in radiological training purposes.
Cross-Modality Image Registration using a Training-Time Privileged Third Modality
In this work, we consider the task of pairwise cross-modality image registration, which may benefit from exploiting additional images available only at training time from an additional modality that is different to those being registered.
The impact of using voxel-level segmentation metrics on evaluating multifocal prostate cancer localisation
However, the differences in false-positives and false-negatives, between the actual errors and the perceived counterparts if DSC is used, can be as high as 152 and 154, respectively, out of the 357 test set lesions.
