On Adversarial Robustness: A Neural Architecture Search perspective

Adversarial robustness of deep learning models has gained much traction in the last few years. Various attacks and defenses are proposed to improve the adversarial robustness of modern-day deep learning architectures. While all these approaches help improve the robustness, one promising direction for improving adversarial robustness is unexplored, i.e., the complex topology of the neural network architecture. In this work, we address the following question: Can the complex topology of a neural network give adversarial robustness without any form of adversarial training?. We answer this empirically by experimenting with different hand-crafted and NAS-based architectures. Our findings show that, for small-scale attacks, NAS-based architectures are more robust for small-scale datasets and simple tasks than hand-crafted architectures. However, as the size of the dataset or the complexity of task increases, hand-crafted architectures are more robust than NAS-based architectures. Our work is the first large-scale study to understand adversarial robustness purely from an architectural perspective. Our study shows that random sampling in the search space of DARTS (a popular NAS method) with simple ensembling can improve the robustness to PGD attack by nearly~12\%. We show that NAS, which is popular for achieving SoTA accuracy, can provide adversarial accuracy as a free add-on without any form of adversarial training. Our results show that leveraging the search space of NAS methods with methods like ensembles can be an excellent way to achieve adversarial robustness without any form of adversarial training. We also introduce a metric that can be used to calculate the trade-off between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness. Code and pre-trained models will be made available at \url{https://github.com/tdchaitanya/nas-robustness}

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods