An Integrated Risk Assessment Process of Safety-Related Digital I&C Systems in Nuclear Power Plants

17 Dec 2021  ·  Hongbin Zhang, Han Bao, Tate Shorthill, Edward Quinn ·

Upgrading the existing analog instrumentation and control (IC) systems to state-of-the-art digital IC (DIC) systems will greatly benefit existing light-water reactors (LWRs). However, the issue of software common cause failure (CCF) remains an obstacle in terms of qualification for digital technologies. Existing analyses of CCFs in I&C systems mainly focus on hardware failures. With the application and upgrading of new DIC systems, design flaws could cause software CCFs to become a potential threat to plant safety, considering that most redundancy designs use similar digital platforms or software in their operating and application systems. With complex multi-layer redundancy designs to meet the single failure criterion, these IC safety systems are of particular concern in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing procedures. In Fiscal Year 2019, the Risk-Informed Systems Analysis (RISA) Pathway of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program initiated a project to develop a risk assessment strategy for delivering a strong technical basis to support effective, licensable, and secure DIC technologies for digital upgrades and designs. An integrated risk assessment for the DIC (IRADIC) process was proposed for this strategy to identify potential key digital-induced failures, implement reliability analyses of related digital safety IC systems, and evaluate the unanalyzed sequences introduced by these failures (particularly software CCFs) at the plant level. This paper summarizes these RISA efforts in the risk analysis of safety-related DIC systems at Idaho National Laboratory.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Tasks


Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here