An Orchestrated Empirical Study on Deep Learning Frameworks and Platforms

13 Nov 2018  ·  Qianyu Guo, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma, Qiang Hu, Ruitao Feng, Li Li, Yang Liu, Jianjun Zhao, Xiaohong Li ·

Deep learning (DL) has recently achieved tremendous success in a variety of cutting-edge applications, e.g., image recognition, speech and natural language processing, and autonomous driving. Besides the available big data and hardware evolution, DL frameworks and platforms play a key role to catalyze the research, development, and deployment of DL intelligent solutions. However, the difference in computation paradigm, architecture design and implementation of existing DL frameworks and platforms brings challenges for DL software development, deployment, maintenance, and migration. Up to the present, it still lacks a comprehensive study on how current diverse DL frameworks and platforms influence the DL software development process. In this paper, we initiate the first step towards the investigation on how existing state-of-the-art DL frameworks (i.e., TensorFlow, Theano, and Torch) and platforms (i.e., server/desktop, web, and mobile) support the DL software development activities. We perform an in-depth and comparative evaluation on metrics such as learning accuracy, DL model size, robustness, and performance, on state-of-the-art DL frameworks across platforms using two popular datasets MNIST and CIFAR-10. Our study reveals that existing DL frameworks still suffer from compatibility issues, which becomes even more severe when it comes to different platforms. We pinpoint the current challenges and opportunities towards developing high quality and compatible DL systems. To ignite further investigation along this direction to address urgent industrial demands of intelligent solutions, we make all of our assembled feasible toolchain and dataset publicly available.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here