We evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms for automatic cognate detection by comparing how useful automatically inferred cognates are for the task of phylogenetic inference compared to classical manually annotated cognate sets. Our findings suggest that phylogenies inferred from automated cognate sets come close to phylogenies inferred from expert-annotated ones, although on average, the latter are still superior... (read more)
PDF| METHOD | TYPE | |
|---|---|---|
| 🤖 No Methods Found | Help the community by adding them if they're not listed; e.g. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition uses ResNet |