Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs

Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.

PDF Abstract NeurIPS 2023 PDF NeurIPS 2023 Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Text-To-SQL BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation) Palm-2 (Baseline) Execution Accuracy % (Test) 33.04 # 15
Execution Accuracy % (Dev) 27.38 # 15
Text-To-SQL BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation) Codex (Baseline) Execution Accuracy % (Test) 36.47 # 14
Execution Accuracy % (Dev) 34.35 # 14
Text-To-SQL BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation) ChatGPT (Baseline) Execution Accuracy % (Test) 39.30 # 13
Execution Accuracy % (Dev) 37.22 # 12
Text-To-SQL BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation) CoT + ChatGPT Execution Accuracy % (Test) 40.08 # 12
Execution Accuracy % (Dev) 36.64 # 13
Text-To-SQL BIRD (BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQL Evaluation) Human Performance Execution Accurarcy (Human) 92.96 # 1

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here