Transferability of Adversarial Examples to Attack Cloud-based Image Classifier Service

8 Jan 2020  ·  Dou Goodman ·

In recent years, Deep Learning(DL) techniques have been extensively deployed for computer vision tasks, particularly visual classification problems, where new algorithms reported to achieve or even surpass the human performance. While many recent works demonstrated that DL models are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Fortunately, generating adversarial examples usually requires white-box access to the victim model, and real-world cloud-based image classification services are more complex than white-box classifier,the architecture and parameters of DL models on cloud platforms cannot be obtained by the attacker. The attacker can only access the APIs opened by cloud platforms. Thus, keeping models in the cloud can usually give a (false) sense of security. In this paper, we mainly focus on studying the security of real-world cloud-based image classification services. Specifically, (1) We propose a novel attack method, Fast Featuremap Loss PGD (FFL-PGD) attack based on Substitution model, which achieves a high bypass rate with a very limited number of queries. Instead of millions of queries in previous studies, our method finds the adversarial examples using only two queries per image; and (2) we make the first attempt to conduct an extensive empirical study of black-box attacks against real-world cloud-based classification services. Through evaluations on four popular cloud platforms including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Clarifai, we demonstrate that FFL-PGD attack has a success rate over 90\% among different classification services. (3) We discuss the possible defenses to address these security challenges in cloud-based classification services. Our defense technology is mainly divided into model training stage and image preprocessing stage.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here