Compound Type Identification in Sanskrit: What Roles do the Corpus and Grammar Play?

We propose a classification framework for semantic type identification of compounds in Sanskrit. We broadly classify the compounds into four different classes namely, \textit{Avyay{\=\i}bh{\=a}va}, \textit{Tatpuruṣa}, \textit{Bahuvr{\=\i}hi} and \textit{Dvandva}. Our classification is based on the traditional classification system followed by the ancient grammar treatise \textit{Adṣṭ{\=a}dhy{\=a}y{\=\i}}, proposed by P{\=a}ṇini 25 centuries back. We construct an elaborate features space for our system by combining conditional rules from the grammar \textit{Adṣṭ{\=a}dhy{\=a}y{\=\i}}, semantic relations between the compound components from a lexical database \textit{Amarakoṣa} and linguistic structures from the data using Adaptor Grammars. Our in-depth analysis of the feature space highlight inadequacy of \textit{Adṣṭ{\=a}dhy{\=a}y{\=\i}}, a generative grammar, in classifying the data samples. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of using lexical databases as suggested by Amba Kulkarni and Anil Kumar, and put forward a new research direction by introducing linguistic patterns obtained from Adaptor grammars for effective identification of compound type. We utilise an ensemble based approach, specifically designed for handling skewed datasets and we {\%}and Experimenting with various classification methods, we achieve an overall accuracy of 0.77 using random forest classifiers.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here