Deep Blind Video Super-resolution

Existing video super-resolution (SR) algorithms usually assume that the blur kernels in the degradation process are known and do not model the blur kernels in the restoration. However, this assumption does not hold for video SR and usually leads to over-smoothed super-resolved images. In this paper, we propose a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model to solve video SR by a blur kernel modeling approach. The proposed deep CNN model consists of motion blur estimation, motion estimation, and latent image restoration modules. The motion blur estimation module is used to provide reliable blur kernels. With the estimated blur kernel, we develop an image deconvolution method based on the image formation model of video SR to generate intermediate latent images so that some sharp image contents can be restored well. However, the generated intermediate latent images may contain artifacts. To generate high-quality images, we use the motion estimation module to explore the information from adjacent frames, where the motion estimation can constrain the deep CNN model for better image restoration. We show that the proposed algorithm is able to generate clearer images with finer structural details. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed algorithm performs favorably against state-of-the-art methods.

PDF Abstract ICCV 2021 PDF ICCV 2021 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Video Super-Resolution MSU Super-Resolution for Video Compression DBVSR + aomenc BSQ-rate over ERQA 13.476 # 60
BSQ-rate over VMAF 2.093 # 47
BSQ-rate over PSNR 10.296 # 54
BSQ-rate over MS-SSIM 3.886 # 49
BSQ-rate over LPIPS 4.916 # 44
Video Super-Resolution MSU Super-Resolution for Video Compression DBVSR + x264 BSQ-rate over ERQA 1.606 # 10
BSQ-rate over VMAF 0.75 # 12
BSQ-rate over PSNR 1.082 # 6
BSQ-rate over MS-SSIM 0.714 # 6
BSQ-rate over LPIPS 1.293 # 16
Video Super-Resolution MSU Super-Resolution for Video Compression DBVSR + uavs3e BSQ-rate over ERQA 7.0 # 35
BSQ-rate over VMAF 1.83 # 41
BSQ-rate over PSNR 5.845 # 28
BSQ-rate over MS-SSIM 2.396 # 41
BSQ-rate over LPIPS 4.371 # 35
Video Super-Resolution MSU Super-Resolution for Video Compression DBVSR + vvenc BSQ-rate over ERQA 15.988 # 69
BSQ-rate over Subjective Score 2.842 # 42
BSQ-rate over VMAF 0.698 # 5
BSQ-rate over PSNR 5.765 # 23
BSQ-rate over MS-SSIM 0.898 # 19
BSQ-rate over LPIPS 11.435 # 62
Video Super-Resolution MSU Super-Resolution for Video Compression DBVSR + x265 BSQ-rate over ERQA 13.145 # 54
BSQ-rate over VMAF 1.383 # 28
BSQ-rate over PSNR 6.607 # 36
BSQ-rate over MS-SSIM 1.438 # 26
BSQ-rate over LPIPS 13.211 # 73
Video Super-Resolution MSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration DBVSR Subjective score 6.947 # 4
ERQAv1.0 0.737 # 6
QRCRv1.0 0.629 # 3
SSIM 0.894 # 6
PSNR 31.071 # 6
FPS 0.241 # 26
1 - LPIPS 0.921 # 6
Video Super-Resolution MSU Video Upscalers: Quality Enhancement DBVSR PSNR 27.28 # 36
SSIM 0.937 # 45
VMAF 57.39 # 5

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here