End-to-End Referring Video Object Segmentation with Multimodal Transformers

29 Nov 2021  ·  Adam Botach, Evgenii Zheltonozhskii, Chaim Baskin ·

The referring video object segmentation task (RVOS) involves segmentation of a text-referred object instance in the frames of a given video. Due to the complex nature of this multimodal task, which combines text reasoning, video understanding, instance segmentation and tracking, existing approaches typically rely on sophisticated pipelines in order to tackle it... In this paper, we propose a simple Transformer-based approach to RVOS. Our framework, termed Multimodal Tracking Transformer (MTTR), models the RVOS task as a sequence prediction problem. Following recent advancements in computer vision and natural language processing, MTTR is based on the realization that video and text can both be processed together effectively and elegantly by a single multimodal Transformer model. MTTR is end-to-end trainable, free of text-related inductive bias components and requires no additional mask-refinement post-processing steps. As such, it simplifies the RVOS pipeline considerably compared to existing methods. Evaluation on standard benchmarks reveals that MTTR significantly outperforms previous art across multiple metrics. In particular, MTTR shows impressive +5.7 and +5.0 mAP gains on the A2D-Sentences and JHMDB-Sentences datasets respectively, while processing 76 frames per second. In addition, we report strong results on the public validation set of Refer-YouTube-VOS, a more challenging RVOS dataset that has yet to receive the attention of researchers. The code to reproduce our experiments is available at https://github.com/mttr2021/MTTR read more

PDF Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Referring Expression Segmentation A2D Sentences MTTR (w=8) Precision@0.5 0.721 # 3
Precision@0.9 0.164 # 4
IoU overall 0.702 # 3
IoU mean 0.618 # 4
Precision@0.6 0.684 # 3
Precision@0.7 0.607 # 4
Precision@0.8 0.456 # 4
AP 0.447 # 3
Referring Expression Segmentation A2D Sentences MTTR (w=10) Precision@0.5 0.754 # 2
Precision@0.9 0.169 # 3
IoU overall 0.72 # 2
IoU mean 0.64 # 3
Precision@0.6 0.712 # 2
Precision@0.7 0.638 # 2
Precision@0.8 0.485 # 3
AP 0.461 # 2
Referring Expression Segmentation J-HMDB MTTR (w=8) Precision@0.5 0.91 # 2
Precision@0.6 0.815 # 2
Precision@0.7 0.57 # 2
Precision@0.8 0.144 # 4
Precision@0.9 0.001 # 3
AP 0.366 # 2
IoU overall 0.674 # 2
IoU mean 0.679 # 2
Referring Expression Segmentation J-HMDB MTTR (w=10) Precision@0.5 0.939 # 1
Precision@0.6 0.852 # 1
Precision@0.7 0.616 # 1
Precision@0.8 0.166 # 2
Precision@0.9 0.001 # 3
AP 0.392 # 1
IoU overall 0.701 # 1
IoU mean 0.698 # 1
Referring Expression Segmentation Refer-YouTube-VOS (2021 public validation) MTTR (w=12) J&F 55.32 # 5
J 54.00 # 5
F 56.64 # 4

Methods