Evaluating Persuasion Strategies and Deep Reinforcement Learning methods for Negotiation Dialogue agents
In this paper we present a comparative evaluation of various negotiation strategies within an online version of the game {``}Settlers of Catan{''}. The comparison is based on human subjects playing games against artificial game-playing agents ({`}bots{'}) which implement different negotiation dialogue strategies, using a chat dialogue interface to negotiate trades. Our results suggest that a negotiation strategy that uses persuasion, as well as a strategy that is trained from data using Deep Reinforcement Learning, both lead to an improved win rate against humans, compared to previous rule-based and supervised learning baseline dialogue negotiators.
PDF Abstract
Datasets
Add Datasets
introduced or used in this paper
Results from the Paper
Submit
results from this paper
to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the
community compare results to other papers.
Methods
No methods listed for this paper. Add
relevant methods here
