Fine-Grained Representation Learning and Recognition by Exploiting Hierarchical Semantic Embedding

14 Aug 2018  ·  Tianshui Chen, Wenxi Wu, Yuefang Gao, Le Dong, Xiaonan Luo, Liang Lin ·

Object categories inherently form a hierarchy with different levels of concept abstraction, especially for fine-grained categories. For example, birds (Aves) can be categorized according to a four-level hierarchy of order, family, genus, and species. This hierarchy encodes rich correlations among various categories across different levels, which can effectively regularize the semantic space and thus make prediction less ambiguous. However, previous studies of fine-grained image recognition primarily focus on categories of one certain level and usually overlook this correlation information. In this work, we investigate simultaneously predicting categories of different levels in the hierarchy and integrating this structured correlation information into the deep neural network by developing a novel Hierarchical Semantic Embedding (HSE) framework. Specifically, the HSE framework sequentially predicts the category score vector of each level in the hierarchy, from highest to lowest. At each level, it incorporates the predicted score vector of the higher level as prior knowledge to learn finer-grained feature representation. During training, the predicted score vector of the higher level is also employed to regularize label prediction by using it as soft targets of corresponding sub-categories. To evaluate the proposed framework, we organize the 200 bird species of the Caltech-UCSD birds dataset with the four-level category hierarchy and construct a large-scale butterfly dataset that also covers four level categories. Extensive experiments on these two and the newly-released VegFru datasets demonstrate the superiority of our HSE framework over the baseline methods and existing competitors.

PDF Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Fine-Grained Image Classification CUB-200-2011 Hierarchical Semantic Embedding Accuracy 88.1% # 51

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here