Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answering

NAACL 2021  ·  Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy, Mohit Iyyer ·

The task of long-form question answering (LFQA) involves retrieving documents relevant to a given question and using them to generate a paragraph-length answer. While many models have recently been proposed for LFQA, we show in this paper that the task formulation raises fundamental challenges regarding evaluation and dataset creation that currently preclude meaningful modeling progress. To demonstrate these challenges, we first design a new system that relies on sparse attention and contrastive retriever learning to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the ELI5 LFQA dataset. While our system tops the public leaderboard, a detailed analysis reveals several troubling trends: (1) our system's generated answers are not actually grounded in the documents that it retrieves; (2) ELI5 contains significant train / validation overlap, as at least 81% of ELI5 validation questions occur in paraphrased form in the training set; (3) ROUGE-L is not an informative metric of generated answer quality and can be easily gamed; and (4) human evaluations used for other text generation tasks are unreliable for LFQA. We offer suggestions to mitigate each of these issues, which we hope will lead to more rigorous LFQA research and meaningful progress in the future.

PDF Abstract NAACL 2021 PDF NAACL 2021 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Open-Domain Question Answering KILT: ELI5 arxiv.org/abs/2103.06332 KILT-RL 2.36 # 2
R-Prec 10.67 # 5
Recall@5 24.56 # 5
ROUGE-L 23.19 # 2
F1 22.88 # 2
KILT-F1 2.34 # 2

Methods