Improving the Coverage and the Generalization Ability of Neural Word Sense Disambiguation through Hypernymy and Hyponymy Relationships

2 Nov 2018  ·  Loïc Vial, Benjamin Lecouteux, Didier Schwab ·

In Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), the predominant approach generally involves a supervised system trained on sense annotated corpora. The limited quantity of such corpora however restricts the coverage and the performance of these systems. In this article, we propose a new method that solves these issues by taking advantage of the knowledge present in WordNet, and especially the hypernymy and hyponymy relationships between synsets, in order to reduce the number of different sense tags that are necessary to disambiguate all words of the lexical database. Our method leads to state of the art results on most WSD evaluation tasks, while improving the coverage of supervised systems, reducing the training time and the size of the models, without additional training data. In addition, we exhibit results that significantly outperform the state of the art when our method is combined with an ensembling technique and the addition of the WordNet Gloss Tagged as training corpus.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Benchmark
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2007 Task 17 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 66.81 # 2
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2007 Task 7 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 86.02 # 2
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2013 Task 12 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 72.63 # 2
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2015 Task 13 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 74.46 # 2
Word Sense Disambiguation SensEval 2 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 75.15 # 2
Word Sense Disambiguation SensEval 3 Task 1 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 70.11 # 7
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble Senseval 2 75.15 # 15
Senseval 3 70.11 # 18
SemEval 2007 66.81 # 15
SemEval 2013 72.63 # 14
SemEval 2015 74.46 # 15

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here