Incorporating Structured Representations into Pretrained Vision & Language Models Using Scene Graphs

Vision and language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot (ZS) performance in a variety of tasks. However, recent works have shown that even the best VLMs struggle to capture aspects of compositional scene understanding, such as object attributes, relations, and action states. In contrast, obtaining structured annotations, such as scene graphs (SGs), that could improve these models is time-consuming and costly, and thus cannot be used on a large scale. Here we ask whether small SG datasets can provide sufficient information for enhancing structured understanding of pretrained VLMs. We show that it is indeed possible to improve VLMs when learning from SGs by integrating components that incorporate structured information into both visual and textual representations. For the visual side, we incorporate a special "SG Component" in the image transformer trained to predict SG information, while for the textual side, we utilize SGs to generate fine-grained captions that highlight different compositional aspects of the scene. Our method improves the performance of several popular VLMs on multiple VL datasets with only a mild degradation in ZS capabilities.

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Visual Reasoning Winoground NegCLIP Text Score 29.5 # 71
Image Score 10.5 # 91
Group Score 8.0 # 80
Visual Reasoning Winoground MiniGPT-4 Text Score 23.3 # 90
Image Score 18.0 # 56
Group Score 9.5 # 71
Visual Reasoning Winoground LLaVA Text Score 24.8 # 86
Image Score 25.0 # 34
Group Score 13.0 # 52
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP Text Score 39.0 # 39
Image Score 19.2 # 54
Group Score 15.0 # 44
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP2 Text Score 42.0 # 30
Image Score 23.8 # 40
Group Score 19.0 # 32
Visual Reasoning Winoground NegBLIP2 Text Score 41.5 # 33
Image Score 26.0 # 29
Group Score 20.5 # 29
Visual Reasoning Winoground NegBLIP Text Score 42.5 # 27
Image Score 24.0 # 39
Group Score 18.5 # 35
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP2 (SGVL) Text Score 42.8 # 24
Image Score 28.5 # 22
Group Score 23.3 # 21
Visual Reasoning Winoground CLIP (SGVL) Text Score 32.0 # 60
Image Score 14.0 # 73
Group Score 9.8 # 70
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP (SGVL) Text Score 42.8 # 24
Image Score 27.3 # 25
Group Score 21.5 # 25
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP (+Graph Text, +Graph Neg) Text Score 40.5 # 34
Image Score 25.5 # 33
Group Score 19.0 # 32
Visual Reasoning Winoground BLIP (+Graph Text) Text Score 40.3 # 35
Image Score 20.5 # 50
Group Score 16.5 # 41

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here