Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS

While programming is one of the most broadly applicable skills in modern society, modern machine learning models still cannot code solutions to basic problems. Despite its importance, there has been surprisingly little work on evaluating code generation, and it can be difficult to accurately assess code generation performance rigorously. To meet this challenge, we introduce APPS, a benchmark for code generation. Unlike prior work in more restricted settings, our benchmark measures the ability of models to take an arbitrary natural language specification and generate satisfactory Python code. Similar to how companies assess candidate software developers, we then evaluate models by checking their generated code on test cases. Our benchmark includes 10,000 problems, which range from having simple one-line solutions to being substantial algorithmic challenges. We fine-tune large language models on both GitHub and our training set, and we find that the prevalence of syntax errors is decreasing exponentially as models improve. Recent models such as GPT-Neo can pass approximately 20% of the test cases of introductory problems, so we find that machine learning models are now beginning to learn how to code. As the social significance of automatic code generation increases over the coming years, our benchmark can provide an important measure for tracking advancements.

PDF Abstract


Introduced in the Paper:


Used in the Paper:


Results from the Paper

Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Code Generation APPS GPT-Neo 2.7B Introductory Pass@1 3.90% # 5
Interview Pass@1 0.57% # 5
Competition Pass@1 0.00% # 5
Competition Pass@5 0.00% # 5
Interview Pass@5 0.80% # 5
Introductory Pass@5 5.50% # 5
Competition Pass@any 0.0% # 9
Interview Pass@any 0.80% # 8
Introductory Pass@any 5.50% # 8