MixFormer: End-to-End Tracking with Iterative Mixed Attention

CVPR 2022  ·  Yutao Cui, Cheng Jiang, LiMin Wang, Gangshan Wu ·

Tracking often uses a multi-stage pipeline of feature extraction, target information integration, and bounding box estimation. To simplify this pipeline and unify the process of feature extraction and target information integration, we present a compact tracking framework, termed as MixFormer, built upon transformers. Our core design is to utilize the flexibility of attention operations, and propose a Mixed Attention Module (MAM) for simultaneous feature extraction and target information integration. This synchronous modeling scheme allows to extract target-specific discriminative features and perform extensive communication between target and search area. Based on MAM, we build our MixFormer tracking framework simply by stacking multiple MAMs with progressive patch embedding and placing a localization head on top. In addition, to handle multiple target templates during online tracking, we devise an asymmetric attention scheme in MAM to reduce computational cost, and propose an effective score prediction module to select high-quality templates. Our MixFormer sets a new state-of-the-art performance on five tracking benchmarks, including LaSOT, TrackingNet, VOT2020, GOT-10k, and UAV123. In particular, our MixFormer-L achieves NP score of 79.9% on LaSOT, 88.9% on TrackingNet and EAO of 0.555 on VOT2020. We also perform in-depth ablation studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of simultaneous feature extraction and information integration. Code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/MixFormer.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2022 PDF CVPR 2022 Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Visual Object Tracking GOT-10k MixFormer-1k Average Overlap 71.2 # 15
Success Rate 0.5 79.9 # 12
Success Rate 0.75 65.8 # 11
Visual Object Tracking GOT-10k MixFormer-L Average Overlap 75.6 # 10
Success Rate 0.5 85.73 # 4
Success Rate 0.75 72.8 # 6
Visual Object Tracking GOT-10k MixFormer Average Overlap 70.7 # 17
Success Rate 0.5 80.0 # 10
Success Rate 0.75 67.8 # 10
Visual Object Tracking LaSOT MixFormer-L AUC 70.1 # 19
Normalized Precision 79.9 # 12
Precision 76.3 # 11
Visual Object Tracking TrackingNet MixFormer-L Precision 83.1 # 10
Normalized Precision 88.9 # 7
Accuracy 83.9 # 10
Visual Object Tracking UAV123 MixFormer AUC 0.704 # 8
Precision 0.918 # 2
Semi-Supervised Video Object Segmentation VOT2020 MixFormer-L EAO 0.555 # 11

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here