An Efficient and Flexible Spike Train Model via Empirical Bayes

10 May 2016  ·  Qi She, Xiaoli Wu, Beth Jelfs, Adam S. Charles, Rosa H. M. Chan ·

Accurate statistical models of neural spike responses can characterize the information carried by neural populations. But the limited samples of spike counts during recording usually result in model overfitting. Besides, current models assume spike counts to be Poisson-distributed, which ignores the fact that many neurons demonstrate over-dispersed spiking behaviour. Although the Negative Binomial Generalized Linear Model (NB-GLM) provides a powerful tool for modeling over-dispersed spike counts, the maximum likelihood-based standard NB-GLM leads to highly variable and inaccurate parameter estimates. Thus, we propose a hierarchical parametric empirical Bayes method to estimate the neural spike responses among neuronal population. Our method integrates both Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) and empirical Bayes theory, which aims to (1) improve the accuracy and reliability of parameter estimation, compared to the maximum likelihood-based method for NB-GLM and Poisson-GLM; (2) effectively capture the over-dispersion nature of spike counts from both simulated data and experimental data; and (3) provide insight into both neural interactions and spiking behaviours of the neuronal populations. We apply our approach to study both simulated data and experimental neural data. The estimation of simulation data indicates that the new framework can accurately predict mean spike counts simulated from different models and recover the connectivity weights among neural populations. The estimation based on retinal neurons demonstrate the proposed method outperforms both NB-GLM and Poisson-GLM in terms of the predictive log-likelihood of held-out data. Codes are available in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4704423

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here