TASK |
DATASET |
MODEL |
METRIC NAME |
METRIC VALUE |
GLOBAL RANK |
REMOVE |
Node Classification
|
Actor
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
37.81 ± 1.15
|
# 14
|
|
Node Classification
|
Actor
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
37.79 ± 1.01
|
# 16
|
|
Node Classification
|
Actor
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
37.80 ± 1.22
|
# 15
|
|
Node Classification
|
Chameleon
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
68.04 ± 1.58
|
# 41
|
|
Node Classification
|
Chameleon
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
68.68 ± 1.73
|
# 36
|
|
Node Classification
|
Chameleon
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
67.93 ± 1.58
|
# 42
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Chameleon (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
67.93 ± 1.58
|
# 18
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Chameleon (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
68.68 ± 1.73
|
# 14
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Chameleon (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
68.04 ± 1.58
|
# 17
|
|
Node Classification
|
Citeseer (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
76.70 ± 1.57
|
# 17
|
|
Node Classification
|
Citeseer (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
76.32 ± 1.65
|
# 19
|
|
Node Classification
|
Citeseer (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
77.14 ± 1.85
|
# 9
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cora (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
86.90 ± 1.13
|
# 20
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cora (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
87.14 ± 1.06
|
# 19
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cora (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
87.30 ± 1.15
|
# 18
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cornell
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
86.49 ± 7.35
|
# 8
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cornell
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
85.68 ± 6.51
|
# 17
|
|
Node Classification
|
Cornell
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
84.86 ± 4.71
|
# 26
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Cornell (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
86.49 ± 7.35
|
# 1
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Cornell (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
85.68 ± 6.51
|
# 6
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Cornell (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d) - NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
84.86 ± 4.71
|
# 13
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Film(48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
37.80 ± 1.22
|
# 3
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Film(48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
37.81 ± 1.15
|
# 2
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Film(48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
37.79 ± 1.01
|
# 4
|
|
Node Classification
|
PubMed (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
89.33 ± 0.35
|
# 12
|
|
Node Classification
|
PubMed (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
89.49 ± 0.40
|
# 9
|
|
Node Classification
|
PubMed (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
89.42 ± 0.43
|
# 11
|
|
Node Classification
|
Squirrel
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
56.34 ± 1.32
|
# 33
|
|
Node Classification
|
Squirrel
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
54.78 ± 1.81
|
# 39
|
|
Node Classification
|
Squirrel
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
53.17 ± 1.31
|
# 41
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Squirrel (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
56.34 ± 1.32
|
# 14
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Squirrel (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
53.17 ± 1.31
|
# 18
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Squirrel (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
54.78 ± 1.81
|
# 17
|
|
Node Classification
|
Texas
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
82.97 ± 5.13
|
# 45
|
|
Node Classification
|
Texas
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
85.67 ± 6.95
|
# 28
|
|
Node Classification
|
Texas
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
85.95 ± 5.51
|
# 25
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Texas (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
85.95 ± 5.51
|
# 7
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Texas (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
82.97 ± 5.13
|
# 16
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Texas (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
85.67 ± 6.95
|
# 8
|
|
Node Classification
|
Wisconsin
|
Diag-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
88.63 ± 2.75
|
# 11
|
|
Node Classification
|
Wisconsin
|
Gen-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
89.21 ± 3.84
|
# 6
|
|
Node Classification
|
Wisconsin
|
O(d)-NSD
|
Accuracy
|
89.41 ± 4.74
|
# 5
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Wisconsin (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Diag-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
88.63 ± 2.75
|
# 3
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Wisconsin (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
O(d)-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
89.41 ± 4.74
|
# 1
|
|
Node Classification on Non-Homophilic (Heterophilic) Graphs
|
Wisconsin (48%/32%/20% fixed splits)
|
Gen-NSD
|
1:1 Accuracy
|
89.21 ± 3.84
|
# 2
|
|