PEg TRAnsfer Workflow recognition challenge report: Does multi-modal data improve recognition?

This paper presents the design and results of the "PEg TRAnsfert Workflow recognition" (PETRAW) challenge whose objective was to develop surgical workflow recognition methods based on one or several modalities, among video, kinematic, and segmentation data, in order to study their added value. The PETRAW challenge provided a data set of 150 peg transfer sequences performed on a virtual simulator. This data set was composed of videos, kinematics, semantic segmentation, and workflow annotations which described the sequences at three different granularity levels: phase, step, and activity. Five tasks were proposed to the participants: three of them were related to the recognition of all granularities with one of the available modalities, while the others addressed the recognition with a combination of modalities. Average application-dependent balanced accuracy (AD-Accuracy) was used as evaluation metric to take unbalanced classes into account and because it is more clinically relevant than a frame-by-frame score. Seven teams participated in at least one task and four of them in all tasks. Best results are obtained with the use of the video and the kinematics data with an AD-Accuracy between 93% and 90% for the four teams who participated in all tasks. The improvement between video/kinematic-based methods and the uni-modality ones was significant for all of the teams. However, the difference in testing execution time between the video/kinematic-based and the kinematic-based methods has to be taken into consideration. Is it relevant to spend 20 to 200 times more computing time for less than 3% of improvement? The PETRAW data set is publicly available at www.synapse.org/PETRAW to encourage further research in surgical workflow recognition.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Introduced in the Paper:

PETRAW

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Video, Kinematic & Segmentation Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW MediCIS Task 5 Average AD-Accuracy 89.81 # 4
Video, Kinematic & Segmentation Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW SK Average AD-Accuracy 91.37 # 2
Video, Kinematic & Segmentation Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW NCC Next Average AD-Accuracy 93.09 # 1
Video, Kinematic & Segmentation Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW Hutom Average AD-Accuracy 91.27 # 3
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW MediCIS Average AD-Accuracy 90.18 # 4
Segmentation Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW MediCIS Average AD-Accuracy 87.22 # 3
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW MediCIS Average AD-Accuracy 89.71 # 3
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW SK Average AD-Accuracy 91.61 # 2
Segmentation Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW SK Average AD-Accuracy 88.51 # 1
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW SK Average AD-Accuracy 89.66 # 4
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW NCC Next Average AD-Accuracy 93.09 # 1
Segmentation Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW NCC Next Average AD-Accuracy 87.71 # 2
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW NCC Next Average AD-Accuracy 90.32 # 2
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW MMLAB Average AD-Accuracy 84.8 # 6
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW MedAIR Average AD-Accuracy 86.98 # 5
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW MedAIR Average AD-Accuracy 90.72 # 1
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW JHU-CIRL Average AD-Accuracy 86.45 # 5
Video Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW MediCIS Average AD-Accuracy 89.15 # 3
Video Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW SK Average AD-Accuracy 90.77 # 1
Video Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW NCC Next Average AD-Accuracy 87.77 # 4
Video Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW MedAIR Average AD-Accuracy 84.31 # 5
Video & Kinematic Base Workflow Recognition PETRAW Hutom Average AD-Accuracy 91.33 # 3
Segmentation Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW Hutom Average AD-Accuracy 60.28 # 4
Kinematic Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW Hutom Average AD-Accuracy 84.31 # 6
Video Based Workflow Recognition PETRAW Hutom Average AD-Accuracy 90.51 # 2
Semantic Segmentation PETRAW MediCIS Mean IoU (class) 94 # 3
Semantic Segmentation PETRAW SK Mean IoU (class) 96.4 # 2
Semantic Segmentation PETRAW NCC Next Mean IoU (class) 96.9 # 1
Semantic Segmentation PETRAW Hutom Mean IoU (class) 85 # 4

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here