Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking

In this paper we address issues with image retrieval benchmarking on standard and popular Oxford 5k and Paris 6k datasets. In particular, annotation errors, the size of the dataset, and the level of challenge are addressed: new annotation for both datasets is created with an extra attention to the reliability of the ground truth. Three new protocols of varying difficulty are introduced. The protocols allow fair comparison between different methods, including those using a dataset pre-processing stage. For each dataset, 15 new challenging queries are introduced. Finally, a new set of 1M hard, semi-automatically cleaned distractors is selected. An extensive comparison of the state-of-the-art methods is performed on the new benchmark. Different types of methods are evaluated, ranging from local-feature-based to modern CNN based methods. The best results are achieved by taking the best of the two worlds. Most importantly, image retrieval appears far from being solved.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2018 PDF CVPR 2018 Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE+SP mAP 49.7 # 9
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE mAP 41.3 # 11
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*+SP mAP 36.7 # 13
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*+SP mAP 35.8 # 15
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK* mAP 36.4 # 14
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK* mAP 35.4 # 16
Image Retrieval ROxford (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD mAP 13.2 # 21
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD mAP 33.9 # 22
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK* mAP 59.4 # 17
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK* mAP 60.4 # 15
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*+SP mAP 59.8 # 16
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*+SP mAP 60.6 # 14
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE mAP 66.3 # 10
Image Retrieval ROxford (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE+SP mAP 71.3 # 8
Image Retrieval ROxford Medium without fine-tuning HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD Average mAP 33.9 # 1
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE+SP mAP 45.1 # 14
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE mAP 44.7 # 15
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*+SP mAP 35.0 # 18
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*+SP mAP 31.3 # 20
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK* mAP 34.5 # 19
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK* mAP 31.2 # 21
Image Retrieval RParis (Hard) HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD mAP 17.5 # 22
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–VLAD mAP 43.6 # 22
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK* mAP 59.0 # 21
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK* mAP 61.2 # 19
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–SMK*+SP mAP 59.2 # 20
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–ASMK*+SP mAP 61.4 # 18
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE mAP 68.9 # 16
Image Retrieval RParis (Medium) HesAff–rSIFT–HQE+SP mAP 70.2 # 14

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here