Search Results for author:
Found 20 papers, 5 papers with code
A Reproduction Study of an Annotation-based Human Evaluation of MT Outputs
In this paper we report our reproduction study of the Croatian part of an annotation-based human evaluation of machine-translated user reviews (Popovic, 2020).
The ReproGen Shared Task on Reproducibility of Human Evaluations in NLG: Overview and Results
The NLP field has recently seen a substantial increase in work related to reproducibility of results, and more generally in recognition of the importance of having shared definitions and practices relating to evaluation.
Another PASS: A Reproduction Study of the Human Evaluation of a Football Report Generation System
Clarity had a higher degree of reproducibility than Fluency, as measured by the coefficient of variation.
The Human Evaluation Datasheet: A Template for Recording Details of Human Evaluation Experiments in NLP
This paper presents the Human Evaluation Datasheet (HEDS), a template for recording the details of individual human evaluation experiments in Natural Language Processing (NLP), and reports on first experience of researchers using HEDS sheets in practice.
The Third Multilingual Surface Realisation Shared Task (SR’20): Overview and Evaluation Results
As in SR’18 and SR’19, the shared task comprised two tracks: (1) a Shallow Track where the inputs were full UD structures with word order information removed and tokens lemmatised; and (2) a Deep Track where additionally, functional words and morphological information were removed.
ReproGen: Proposal for a Shared Task on Reproducibility of Human Evaluations in NLG
Across NLP, a growing body of work is looking at the issue of reproducibility.
Twenty Years of Confusion in Human Evaluation: NLG Needs Evaluation Sheets and Standardised Definitions
Human assessment remains the most trusted form of evaluation in NLG, but highly diverse approaches and a proliferation of different quality criteria used by researchers make it difficult to compare results and draw conclusions across papers, with adverse implications for meta-evaluation and reproducibility.
Disentangling the Properties of Human Evaluation Methods: A Classification System to Support Comparability, Meta-Evaluation and Reproducibility Testing
Current standards for designing and reporting human evaluations in NLP mean it is generally unclear which evaluations are comparable and can be expected to yield similar results when applied to the same system outputs.
High-quality Data-to-Text Generation for Severely Under-Resourced Languages with Out-of-the-box Large Language Models
The performance of NLP methods for severely under-resourced languages cannot currently hope to match the state of the art in NLP methods for well resourced languages.
Assessing the Portability of Parameter Matrices Trained by Parameter-Efficient Finetuning Methods
We compare the performance of ported modules with that of equivalent modules trained (i) from scratch, and (ii) from parameters sampled from the same distribution as the ported module.
Data-to-text Generation for Severely Under-Resourced Languages with GPT-3.5: A Bit of Help Needed from Google Translate
LLMs like GPT are great at tasks involving English which dominates in their training data.
Missing Information, Unresponsive Authors, Experimental Flaws: The Impossibility of Assessing the Reproducibility of Previous Human Evaluations in NLP
We report our efforts in identifying a set of previous human evaluations in NLP that would be suitable for a coordinated study examining what makes human evaluations in NLP more/less reproducible.
PEFT-Ref: A Modular Reference Architecture and Typology for Parameter-Efficient Finetuning Techniques
Recent parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) techniques aim to improve over the considerable cost of fully finetuning large pretrained language models (PLM).
Consultation Checklists: Standardising the Human Evaluation of Medical Note Generation
Evaluating automatically generated text is generally hard due to the inherently subjective nature of many aspects of the output quality.
User-Driven Research of Medical Note Generation Software
A growing body of work uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods to automatically generate medical notes from audio recordings of doctor-patient consultations.
Quantified Reproducibility Assessment of NLP Results
This paper describes and tests a method for carrying out quantified reproducibility assessment (QRA) that is based on concepts and definitions from metrology.
Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation Note Generation
In recent years, machine learning models have rapidly become better at generating clinical consultation notes; yet, there is little work on how to properly evaluate the generated consultation notes to understand the impact they may have on both the clinician using them and the patient's clinical safety.
Quantifying Reproducibility in NLP and ML
Reproducibility has become an intensely debated topic in NLP and ML over recent years, but no commonly accepted way of assessing reproducibility, let alone quantifying it, has so far emerged.
The Human Evaluation Datasheet 1.0: A Template for Recording Details of Human Evaluation Experiments in NLP
This paper introduces the Human Evaluation Datasheet, a template for recording the details of individual human evaluation experiments in Natural Language Processing (NLP).
A Systematic Review of Reproducibility Research in Natural Language Processing
Against the background of what has been termed a reproducibility crisis in science, the NLP field is becoming increasingly interested in, and conscientious about, the reproducibility of its results.
