no code implementations • IWCS (ACL) 2021 • Claire Bonial, Mitchell Abrams, David Traum, Clare Voss
We adopt, evaluate, and improve upon a two-step natural language understanding (NLU) pipeline that incrementally tames the variation of unconstrained natural language input and maps to executable robot behaviors.
no code implementations • LREC 2022 • Ada Tur, David Traum
In this paper, we compare two different approaches to language understanding for a human-robot interaction domain in which a human commander gives navigation instructions to a robot.
no code implementations • LREC 2022 • Divya Tadimeti, Kallirroi Georgila, David Traum
We evaluate several publicly available off-the-shelf (commercial and research) automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems on dialogue agent-directed English speech from speakers with General American vs. non-American accents.
Automatic Speech Recognition Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) +1
no code implementations • 25 Mar 2024 • Ishika Singh, David Traum, Jesse Thomason
We demonstrate that LLM-based goal decomposition leads to faster planning times than solving multi-agent PDDL problems directly while simultaneously achieving fewer plan execution steps than a single agent plan alone and preserving execution success.
no code implementations • 26 Oct 2023 • Stephanie M. Lukin, Kimberly A. Pollard, Claire Bonial, Taylor Hudson, Ron Arstein, Clare Voss, David Traum
Human-guided robotic exploration is a useful approach to gathering information at remote locations, especially those that might be too risky, inhospitable, or inaccessible for humans.
no code implementations • LREC 2022 • Shikib Mehri, Yulan Feng, Carla Gordon, Seyed Hossein Alavi, David Traum, Maxine Eskenazi
Our track challenges participants to develop strong response generation models and explore strategies that extend them to back-and-forth interactions with real users.
no code implementations • 18 Mar 2022 • Shikib Mehri, Jinho Choi, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Jan Deriu, Maxine Eskenazi, Milica Gasic, Kallirroi Georgila, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Zekang Li, Verena Rieser, Samira Shaikh, David Traum, Yi-Ting Yeh, Zhou Yu, Yizhe Zhang, Chen Zhang
This is a report on the NSF Future Directions Workshop on Automatic Evaluation of Dialog.
no code implementations • 12 Nov 2020 • Chulaka Gunasekara, Seokhwan Kim, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Abhinav Rastogi, Yun-Nung Chen, Mihail Eric, Behnam Hedayatnia, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Yang Liu, Chao-Wei Huang, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Jinchao Li, Qi Zhu, Lingxiao Luo, Lars Liden, Kaili Huang, Shahin Shayandeh, Runze Liang, Baolin Peng, Zheng Zhang, Swadheen Shukla, Minlie Huang, Jianfeng Gao, Shikib Mehri, Yulan Feng, Carla Gordon, Seyed Hossein Alavi, David Traum, Maxine Eskenazi, Ahmad Beirami, Eunjoon, Cho, Paul A. Crook, Ankita De, Alborz Geramifard, Satwik Kottur, Seungwhan Moon, Shivani Poddar, Rajen Subba
Interactive evaluation of dialog, and 4.
no code implementations • LREC 2020 • Kallirroi Georgila, Anton Leuski, Volodymyr Yanov, David Traum
We evaluate several publicly available off-the-shelf (commercial and research) automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems across diverse dialogue domains (in US-English).
Automatic Speech Recognition Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) +1
no code implementations • LREC 2020 • Jacqueline Brixey, David Sides, Timothy Vizthum, David Traum, Khalil Iskarous
This work introduces additions to the corpus ChoCo, a multimodal corpus for the American indigenous language Choctaw.
no code implementations • LREC 2020 • Claire Bonial, Lucia Donatelli, Mitchell Abrams, Stephanie M. Lukin, Stephen Tratz, Matthew Marge, Ron artstein, David Traum, Clare Voss
This paper describes a schema that enriches Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) in order to provide a semantic representation for facilitating Natural Language Understanding (NLU) in dialogue systems.
Abstract Meaning Representation Natural Language Understanding
no code implementations • LREC 2020 • Kallirroi Georgila, Carla Gordon, Volodymyr Yanov, David Traum
We applied all these dialogue evaluation functions to a held-out portion of our WOz dialogues, and we report results on the predictive power of these different types of dialogue evaluation functions.
no code implementations • LREC 2020 • Seyed Hossein Alavi, Anton Leuski, David Traum
We compare two models for corpus-based selection of dialogue responses: one based on cross-language relevance with a cross-language LSTM model.
no code implementations • WS 2019 • Claire Bonial, Lucia Donatelli, Stephanie M. Lukin, Stephen Tratz, Ron artstein, David Traum, Clare Voss
We detail refinements made to Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) that make the representation more suitable for supporting a situated dialogue system, where a human remotely controls a robot for purposes of search and rescue and reconnaissance.
no code implementations • WS 2019 • Usman Sohail, David Traum
Bliss attempts to create a writing system that makes words easier to distinguish by using pictographic symbols that encapsulate meaning rather than sound, as the English alphabet does for example.
no code implementations • ACL 2018 • Stephanie M. Lukin, Felix Gervits, Cory J. Hayes, Anton Leuski, Pooja Moolchandani, John G. Rogers III, Carlos Sanchez Amaro, Matthew Marge, Clare R. Voss, David Traum
ScoutBot is a dialogue interface to physical and simulated robots that supports collaborative exploration of environments.
no code implementations • WS 2018 • Stephanie M. Lukin, Kimberly A. Pollard, Claire Bonial, Matthew Marge, Cassidy Henry, Ron Arstein, David Traum, Clare R. Voss
This paper identifies stylistic differences in instruction-giving observed in a corpus of human-robot dialogue.
no code implementations • 17 Oct 2017 • Claire Bonial, Matthew Marge, Ron artstein, Ashley Foots, Felix Gervits, Cory J. Hayes, Cassidy Henry, Susan G. Hill, Anton Leuski, Stephanie M. Lukin, Pooja Moolchandani, Kimberly A. Pollard, David Traum, Clare R. Voss
We describe the adaptation and refinement of a graphical user interface designed to facilitate a Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) approach to collecting human-robot dialogue data.
no code implementations • WS 2017 • Kyusong Lee, Tiancheng Zhao, Yulun Du, Edward Cai, Allen Lu, Eli Pincus, David Traum, Stefan Ultes, Lina M. Rojas-Barahona, Milica Gasic, Steve Young, Maxine Eskenazi
DialPort collects user data for connected spoken dialog systems.
no code implementations • WS 2017 • Matthew Marge, Claire Bonial, Ashley Foots, Cory Hayes, Cassidy Henry, Kimberly Pollard, Ron artstein, Clare Voss, David Traum
Robot-directed communication is variable, and may change based on human perception of robot capabilities.
no code implementations • LREC 2016 • Eli Pincus, David Traum
Team word-guessing games where one player, the clue-giver, gives clues attempting to elicit a target-word from another player, the receiver, are a popular form of entertainment and also used for educational purposes.
no code implementations • LREC 2016 • Kathryn J. Collins, David Traum
In this paper, we present a taxonomy of stories told in dialogue.
no code implementations • LREC 2014 • Jonathan Gratch, Ron artstein, Gale Lucas, Giota Stratou, Stefan Scherer, Angela Nazarian, Rachel Wood, Jill Boberg, David DeVault, Stacy Marsella, David Traum, Skip Rizzo, Louis-Philippe Morency
The Distress Analysis Interview Corpus (DAIC) contains clinical interviews designed to support the diagnosis of psychological distress conditions such as anxiety, depression, and post traumatic stress disorder.
no code implementations • LREC 2012 • Priti Aggarwal, Ron artstein, Jillian Gerten, Athanasios Katsamanis, Shrikanth Narayanan, Angela Nazarian, David Traum
In addition to speech recordings, the corpus contains the outputs of speech recognition performed at the time of utterance as well as the system interpretation of the utterances.
no code implementations • LREC 2012 • Harry Bunt, Alex, Jan ersson, Jae-Woong Choe, Alex Chengyu Fang, Koiti Hasida, Volha Petukhova, Andrei Popescu-Belis, David Traum
This paper summarizes the latest, final version of ISO standard 24617-2 ``Semantic annotation framework, Part 2: Dialogue acts''''''''.
no code implementations • LREC 2012 • Kallirroi Georgila, Alan Black, Kenji Sagae, David Traum
To determine the best trade-off between performance and cost, we perform a systematic evaluation of human and synthesized voices with regard to naturalness, conversational aspect, and likability.