no code implementations • 24 May 2024 • Parth Padalkar, Natalia Ślusarz, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Gopal Gupta
Given symbolic concepts, as ASP constraints, that the CNN is biased towards, we convert the concepts to their corresponding vector representations.
no code implementations • 17 May 2024 • Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Kathrin Stark, Grant Passmore, Guy Katz
Recent advances in the verification of deep neural networks (DNNs) have opened the way for broader usage of DNN verification technology in many application areas, including safety-critical ones.
no code implementations • 15 Mar 2024 • Marco Casadio, Tanvi Dinkar, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Luca Arnaboldi, Matthew L. Daggitt, Omri Isac, Guy Katz, Verena Rieser, Oliver Lemon
We propose a number of practical NLP methods that can help to quantify the effects of the embedding gap; and in particular we propose the metric of falsifiability of semantic subspaces as another fundamental metric to be reported as part of the NLP verification pipeline.
1 code implementation • 25 Jan 2024 • Haoze Wu, Omri Isac, Aleksandar Zeljić, Teruhiro Tagomori, Matthew Daggitt, Wen Kokke, Idan Refaeli, Guy Amir, Kyle Julian, Shahaf Bassan, Pei Huang, Ori Lahav, Min Wu, Min Zhang, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Guy Katz, Clark Barrett
This paper serves as a comprehensive system description of version 2. 0 of the Marabou framework for formal analysis of neural networks.
1 code implementation • 12 Jan 2024 • Matthew L. Daggitt, Wen Kokke, Robert Atkey, Natalia Slusarz, Luca Arnaboldi, Ekaterina Komendantskaya
Neuro-symbolic programs -- programs containing both machine learning components and traditional symbolic code -- are becoming increasingly widespread.
no code implementations • 12 Jul 2023 • Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Grant Passmore, Kathrin Stark, Guy Katz, Ekaterina Komendantskaya
In this work, we present a novel implementation of a proof checker for DNN verification.
no code implementations • 6 May 2023 • Marco Casadio, Luca Arnaboldi, Matthew L. Daggitt, Omri Isac, Tanvi Dinkar, Daniel Kienitz, Verena Rieser, Ekaterina Komendantskaya
In particular, many known neural network verification methods that work for computer vision and other numeric datasets do not work for NLP.
no code implementations • 19 Mar 2023 • Natalia Ślusarz, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matthew L. Daggitt, Robert Stewart, Kathrin Stark
A DL consists of a syntax in which specifications are stated and an interpretation function that translates expressions in the syntax into loss functions.
no code implementations • 21 Jul 2022 • Remi Desmartin, Grant Passmore, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matthew Daggitt
Neural networks are increasingly relied upon as components of complex safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles.
no code implementations • 14 Jul 2022 • Natalia Slusarz, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matthew L. Daggitt, Robert Stewart
What difference does a specific choice of DL make in the context of continuous verification?
no code implementations • 21 Jun 2022 • Marco Casadio, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Verena Rieser, Matthew L. Daggitt, Daniel Kienitz, Luca Arnaboldi, Wen Kokke
With the proliferation of Deep Machine Learning into real-life applications, a particular property of this technology has been brought to attention: robustness Neural Networks notoriously present low robustness and can be highly sensitive to small input perturbations.
no code implementations • 29 Sep 2021 • Marco Casadio, Matthew L Daggitt, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Wen Kokke, Robert Stewart
We also perform experiments to compare the applicability and efficacy of different training methods for ensuring the network obeys these different definitions.
no code implementations • 24 May 2021 • Alasdair Hill, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matthew L. Daggitt, Ronald P. A. Petrick
Verification of AI is a challenge that has engineering, algorithmic and programming language components.
1 code implementation • 3 Apr 2021 • Marco Casadio, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Matthew L. Daggitt, Wen Kokke, Guy Katz, Guy Amir, Idan Refaeli
Neural networks are very successful at detecting patterns in noisy data, and have become the technology of choice in many fields.
no code implementations • 10 Aug 2020 • Alasdair Hill, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Ronald P. A. Petrick
In this paper, we present a novel resource logic, the Proof Carrying Plans (PCP) logic that can be used to verify plans produced by AI planners.
no code implementations • 2 Jul 2019 • Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Rob Stewart, Kirsy Duncan, Daniel Kienitz, Pierre Le Hen, Pascal Bacchus
We will discuss future directions for incorporating verification into AI degrees.
no code implementations • 26 Feb 2013 • Jónathan Heras, Ekaterina Komendantskaya
ML4PG is a machine-learning extension that provides statistical proof hints during the process of Coq/SSReflect proof development.
no code implementations • 25 Jan 2013 • Jónathan Heras, Ekaterina Komendantskaya
Development of Interactive Theorem Provers has led to the creation of big libraries and varied infrastructures for formal proofs.
no code implementations • 14 Dec 2012 • Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Jónathan Heras, Gudmund Grov
We present ML4PG - a machine learning extension for Proof General.