no code implementations • 4 Oct 2024 • Eshika Saxena, Alberto Alfarano, Emily Wenger, Kristin Lauter
Promising applications of ML models for cryptanalysis-which often involve modular arithmetic with large $N$ and $q$-motivate reconsideration of this problem.
no code implementations • 2 Feb 2024 • Samuel Stevens, Emily Wenger, Cathy Li, Niklas Nolte, Eshika Saxena, François Charton, Kristin Lauter
Our architecture improvements enable scaling to larger-dimension LWE problems: this work is the first instance of ML attacks recovering sparse binary secrets in dimension $n=1024$, the smallest dimension used in practice for homomorphic encryption applications of LWE where sparse binary secrets are proposed.
2 code implementations • 22 Jun 2022 • Chirag Agarwal, Dan Ley, Satyapriya Krishna, Eshika Saxena, Martin Pawelczyk, Nari Johnson, Isha Puri, Marinka Zitnik, Himabindu Lakkaraju
OpenXAI comprises of the following key components: (i) a flexible synthetic data generator and a collection of diverse real-world datasets, pre-trained models, and state-of-the-art feature attribution methods, and (ii) open-source implementations of eleven quantitative metrics for evaluating faithfulness, stability (robustness), and fairness of explanation methods, in turn providing comparisons of several explanation methods across a wide variety of metrics, models, and datasets.
no code implementations • 14 Mar 2022 • Chirag Agarwal, Nari Johnson, Martin Pawelczyk, Satyapriya Krishna, Eshika Saxena, Marinka Zitnik, Himabindu Lakkaraju
As attribution-based explanation methods are increasingly used to establish model trustworthiness in high-stakes situations, it is critical to ensure that these explanations are stable, e. g., robust to infinitesimal perturbations to an input.