Search Results for author: Farjana Sultana Mim

Found 8 papers, 4 papers with code

TYPIC: A Corpus of Template-Based Diagnostic Comments on Argumentation

1 code implementation LREC 2022 Shoichi Naito, Shintaro Sawada, Chihiro Nakagawa, Naoya Inoue, Kenshi Yamaguchi, Iori Shimizu, Farjana Sultana Mim, Keshav Singh, Kentaro Inui

In this paper, we define three criteria that a template set should satisfy: expressiveness, informativeness, and uniqueness, and verify the feasibility of creating a template set that satisfies these criteria as a first trial.

Informativeness slot-filling +1

Corruption Is Not All Bad: Incorporating Discourse Structure into Pre-training via Corruption for Essay Scoring

no code implementations13 Oct 2020 Farjana Sultana Mim, Naoya Inoue, Paul Reisert, Hiroki Ouchi, Kentaro Inui

Existing approaches for automated essay scoring and document representation learning typically rely on discourse parsers to incorporate discourse structure into text representation.

Automated Essay Scoring Language Modelling +4

Annotating Implicit Reasoning in Arguments with Causal Links

no code implementations26 Oct 2021 Keshav Singh, Naoya Inoue, Farjana Sultana Mim, Shoichi Naitoh, Kentaro Inui

Most of the existing work that focus on the identification of implicit knowledge in arguments generally represent implicit knowledge in the form of commonsense or factual knowledge.

Exploring Methodologies for Collecting High-Quality Implicit Reasoning in Arguments

1 code implementation EMNLP (ArgMining) 2021 Keshav Singh, Farjana Sultana Mim, Naoya Inoue, Shoichi Naito, Kentaro Inui

Annotation of implicit reasoning (i. e., warrant) in arguments is a critical resource to train models in gaining deeper understanding and correct interpretation of arguments.

Vocal Bursts Intensity Prediction

LPAttack: A Feasible Annotation Scheme for Capturing Logic Pattern of Attacks in Arguments

no code implementations LREC 2022 Farjana Sultana Mim, Naoya Inoue, Shoichi Naito, Keshav Singh, Kentaro Inui

Attacking is not always straightforward and often comprise complex rhetorical moves such that arguers might agree with a logic of an argument while attacking another logic.

IRAC: A Domain-Specific Annotated Corpus of Implicit Reasoning in Arguments

1 code implementation LREC 2022 Keshav Singh, Naoya Inoue, Farjana Sultana Mim, Shoichi Naito, Kentaro Inui

To solve this problem, we hypothesize that as human reasoning is guided by innate collection of domain-specific knowledge, it might be beneficial to create such a domain-specific corpus for machines.

Teach Me How to Improve My Argumentation Skills: A Survey on Feedback in Argumentation

no code implementations28 Jul 2023 Camélia Guerraoui, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Farjana Sultana Mim, Shoichi Naito, Jungmin Choi, Irfan Robbani, Wenzhi Wang, Kentaro Inui

The use of argumentation in education has been shown to improve critical thinking skills for end-users such as students, and computational models for argumentation have been developed to assist in this process.

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.