no code implementations • 5 Jul 2017 • Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, Jann Spiess
In this paper we present tools for applied researchers that re-purpose off-the-shelf methods from the computer-science field of machine learning to create a "discovery engine" for data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
no code implementations • 23 Jan 2021 • Lea Bottmer, Guido Imbens, Jann Spiess, Merrill Warnick
Since their introduction in Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003), Synthetic Control (SC) methods have quickly become one of the leading methods for estimating causal effects in observational studies in settings with panel data.
no code implementations • 12 Mar 2021 • Jann Spiess, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Victor Yaneng Wang
In this paper, we propose a machine-learning method that is specifically optimized for finding such subgroups in noisy data.
no code implementations • 8 Aug 2021 • Stephen Coussens, Jann Spiess
In the case where both the treatment and instrument are binary and the instrument is independent of baseline covariates, we study weighting each observation according to its estimated compliance (that is, its conditional probability of being affected by the instrument), which we motivate from a (constrained) solution of the first-stage prediction problem implicit to IV.
1 code implementation • 27 Aug 2021 • Kirill Borusyak, Xavier Jaravel, Jann Spiess
We develop a framework for difference-in-differences designs with staggered treatment adoption and heterogeneous causal effects.
no code implementations • 5 Oct 2021 • Laura Blattner, Scott Nelson, Jann Spiess
We show how to optimally regulate prediction algorithms in a world where an agent uses complex 'black-box' prediction functions to make decisions such as lending, medical testing, or hiring, and where a principal is limited in how much she can learn about the agent's black-box model.
no code implementations • 28 Oct 2021 • Talia Gillis, Bryce McLaughlin, Jann Spiess
In this article, we therefore consider in a formal model and in a lab experiment how properties of machine predictions affect the resulting human decisions.
no code implementations • NeurIPS 2021 • Nick Doudchenko, Khashayar Khosravi, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Sebastien Lahaie, Miles Lubin, Vahab Mirrokni, Jann Spiess, Guido Imbens
We investigate the optimal design of experimental studies that have pre-treatment outcome data available.
no code implementations • 16 Aug 2022 • Bryce McLaughlin, Jann Spiess
When an algorithm provides risk assessments, we typically think of them as helpful inputs to human decisions, such as when risk scores are presented to judges or doctors.
no code implementations • 20 Aug 2022 • Maximilian Kasy, Jann Spiess
We show that implementation requires pre-analysis plans.
1 code implementation • NeurIPS 2023 • Jann Spiess, Guido Imbens, Amar Venugopal
Motivated by a recent literature on the double-descent phenomenon in machine learning, we consider highly over-parameterized models in causal inference, including synthetic control with many control units.
no code implementations • 12 Oct 2023 • Susan Athey, Niall Keleher, Jann Spiess
Nonetheless, targeting on low baseline outcomes is common in practice, for example because the relationship between individual characteristics and treatment effects is often difficult or impossible to estimate with historical data.
no code implementations • 1 Nov 2023 • Rahul Ladhania, Jann Spiess, Lyle Ungar, Wenbo Wu
We consider learning personalized assignments to one of many treatment arms from a randomized controlled trial.