Search Results for author: Lily Peng

Found 17 papers, 3 papers with code

AI system for fetal ultrasound in low-resource settings

no code implementations18 Mar 2022 Ryan G. Gomes, Bellington Vwalika, Chace Lee, Angelica Willis, Marcin Sieniek, Joan T. Price, Christina Chen, Margaret P. Kasaro, James A. Taylor, Elizabeth M. Stringer, Scott Mayer McKinney, Ntazana Sindano, George E. Dahl, William Goodnight III, Justin Gilmer, Benjamin H. Chi, Charles Lau, Terry Spitz, T Saensuksopa, Kris Liu, Jonny Wong, Rory Pilgrim, Akib Uddin, Greg Corrado, Lily Peng, Katherine Chou, Daniel Tse, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Shravya Shetty

Using a simplified sweep protocol with real-time AI feedback on sweep quality, we have demonstrated the generalization of model performance to minimally trained novice ultrasound operators using low cost ultrasound devices with on-device AI integration.

Detecting hidden signs of diabetes in external eye photographs

no code implementations23 Nov 2020 Boris Babenko, Akinori Mitani, Ilana Traynis, Naho Kitade, Preeti Singh, April Maa, Jorge Cuadros, Greg S. Corrado, Lily Peng, Dale R. Webster, Avinash Varadarajan, Naama Hammel, Yun Liu

In validation set A (n=27, 415 patients, all undilated), the DLS detected poor blood glucose control (HbA1c > 9%) with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 70. 2; moderate-or-worse DR with an AUC of 75. 3; diabetic macular edema with an AUC of 78. 0; and vision-threatening DR with an AUC of 79. 4.

Management

Detecting Anemia from Retinal Fundus Images

no code implementations12 Apr 2019 Akinori Mitani, Yun Liu, Abigail Huang, Greg S. Corrado, Lily Peng, Dale R. Webster, Naama Hammel, Avinash V. Varadarajan

Despite its high prevalence, anemia is often undetected due to the invasiveness and cost of screening and diagnostic tests.

Predicting Progression of Age-related Macular Degeneration from Fundus Images using Deep Learning

no code implementations10 Apr 2019 Boris Babenko, Siva Balasubramanian, Katy E. Blumer, Greg S. Corrado, Lily Peng, Dale R. Webster, Naama Hammel, Avinash V. Varadarajan

For predicting progression specifically from iAMD, the DL algorithm's sensitivity (57+/-6%) was also higher compared to the 9-step grades (36+/-8%) and the 4-category grades (20+/-0%).

Specificity

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.