Search Results for author: Milad Alshomary

Found 16 papers, 10 papers with code

Identifying the Human Values behind Arguments

1 code implementation ACL 2022 Johannes Kiesel, Milad Alshomary, Nicolas Handke, Xiaoni Cai, Henning Wachsmuth, Benno Stein

First experiments with the automatic classification of human values are promising, with F_1-scores up to 0. 81 and 0. 25 on average.

Argument Mining

Modeling the Quality of Dialogical Explanations

no code implementations1 Mar 2024 Milad Alshomary, Felix Lange, Meisam Booshehri, Meghdut Sengupta, Philipp Cimiano, Henning Wachsmuth

In this work, we study explanation dialogues in terms of the interactions between the explainer and explainee and how they correlate with the quality of explanations in terms of a successful understanding on the explainee's side.

Conclusion-based Counter-Argument Generation

no code implementations24 Jan 2023 Milad Alshomary, Henning Wachsmuth

In real-world debates, the most common way to counter an argument is to reason against its main point, that is, its conclusion.

"Mama Always Had a Way of Explaining Things So I Could Understand'': A Dialogue Corpus for Learning to Construct Explanations

1 code implementation6 Sep 2022 Henning Wachsmuth, Milad Alshomary

As AI is more and more pervasive in everyday life, humans have an increasing demand to understand its behavior and decisions.

The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Arguments

1 code implementation ACL 2022 Milad Alshomary, Roxanne El Baff, Timon Gurcke, Henning Wachsmuth

An audience's prior beliefs and morals are strong indicators of how likely they will be affected by a given argument.

Generating Informative Conclusions for Argumentative Texts

1 code implementation Findings (ACL) 2021 Shahbaz Syed, Khalid Al-Khatib, Milad Alshomary, Henning Wachsmuth, Martin Potthast

Third, insights are provided into the suitability of our corpus for the task, the differences between the two generation paradigms, the trade-off between informativeness and conciseness, and the impact of encoding argumentative knowledge.


Belief-based Generation of Argumentative Claims

1 code implementation EACL 2021 Milad Alshomary, Wei-Fan Chen, Timon Gurcke, Henning Wachsmuth

In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by studying the task of belief-based claim generation: Given a controversial topic and a set of beliefs, generate an argumentative claim tailored to the beliefs.

Informativeness Text Generation

Target Inference in Argument Conclusion Generation

no code implementations ACL 2020 Milad Alshomary, Shahbaz Syed, Martin Potthast, Henning Wachsmuth

In particular, we argue here that a decisive step is to infer a conclusion{'}s target, and we hypothesize that this target is related to the premises{'} targets.

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.