1 code implementation • Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks 2021 • Benjamin Wilson, William Qi, Tanmay Agarwal, John Lambert, Jagjeet Singh, Siddhesh Khandelwal, Bowen Pan, Ratnesh Kumar, Andrew Hartnett, Jhony Kaesemodel Pontes, Deva Ramanan, Peter Carr, James Hays
Models are tasked with the prediction of future motion for "scored actors" in each scenario and are provided with track histories that capture object location, heading, velocity, and category.
no code implementations • 1 Jul 2021 • Peter Carr, Roger Lee, Matthew Lorig
We price and replicate a variety of claims written on the log price $X$ and quadratic variation $[X]$ of a risky asset, modeled as a positive semimartingale, subject to stochastic volatility and jumps.
no code implementations • 11 May 2020 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin, Dmitry Muravey
The second one is the method of generalized integral transform, which is also extended to the Bessel process.
no code implementations • 19 Mar 2020 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin
In this paper we develop a semi-closed form solutions for the barrier (perhaps, time-dependent) and American options written on the underlying stock which follows a time-dependent OU process with a log-normal drift.
3 code implementations • CVPR 2019 • Ming-Fang Chang, John Lambert, Patsorn Sangkloy, Jagjeet Singh, Slawomir Bak, Andrew Hartnett, De Wang, Peter Carr, Simon Lucey, Deva Ramanan, James Hays
In our baseline experiments, we illustrate how detailed map information such as lane direction, driveable area, and ground height improves the accuracy of 3D object tracking and motion forecasting.
no code implementations • 20 Aug 2019 • Peter Carr, Sander Willems
This paper presents a novel one-factor stochastic volatility model where the instantaneous volatility of the asset log-return is a diffusion with a quadratic drift and a linear dispersion function.
no code implementations • 17 Jul 2019 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin, SASHA STOIKOV
We derive a backward and forward nonlinear PDEs that govern the implied volatility of a contingent claim whenever the latter is well-defined.
no code implementations • 19 Apr 2019 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin
In this paper we apply Markovian approximation of the fractional Brownian motion (BM), known as the Dobric-Ojeda (DO) process, to the fractional stochastic volatility model where the instantaneous variance is modelled by a lognormal process with drift and fractional diffusion.
no code implementations • 19 Sep 2018 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin
This paper describes another extension of the Local Variance Gamma model originally proposed by P. Carr in 2008, and then further elaborated on by Carr and Nadtochiy, 2017 (CN2017), and Carr and Itkin, 2018 (CI2018).
no code implementations • ECCV 2018 • Slawomir Bak, Peter Carr, Jean-Francois Lalonde
To achieve better accuracy in unseen illumination conditions we propose a novel domain adaptation technique that takes advantage of our synthetic data and performs fine-tuning in a completely unsupervised way.
Ranked #13 on Person Re-Identification on PRID2011
no code implementations • CVPR 2018 • Shuang Li, Slawomir Bak, Peter Carr, Xiaogang Wang
As a result, the network learns latent representations of the face, torso and other body parts using the best available image patches from the entire video sequence.
no code implementations • 26 Feb 2018 • Peter Carr, Andrey Itkin
The paper proposes an expanded version of the Local Variance Gamma model of Carr and Nadtochiy by adding drift to the governing underlying process.
no code implementations • CVPR 2017 • Zhiwei Deng, Rajitha Navarathna, Peter Carr, Stephan Mandt, Yisong Yue, Iain Matthews, Greg Mori
Matrix and tensor factorization methods are often used for finding underlying low-dimensional patterns from noisy data.
no code implementations • CVPR 2017 • Slawomir Bak, Peter Carr
The proposed one-shot learning achieves performance that is competitive with supervised methods, but uses only a single example rather than the hundreds required for the fully supervised case.
no code implementations • ICML 2017 • Hoang M. Le, Yisong Yue, Peter Carr, Patrick Lucey
We study the problem of imitation learning from demonstrations of multiple coordinating agents.
2 code implementations • 3 Jun 2016 • Hoang M. Le, Andrew Kang, Yisong Yue, Peter Carr
We study the problem of smooth imitation learning for online sequence prediction, where the goal is to train a policy that can smoothly imitate demonstrated behavior in a dynamic and continuous environment in response to online, sequential context input.
no code implementations • CVPR 2016 • Jianhui Chen, Hoang M. Le, Peter Carr, Yisong Yue, James J. Little
We study the problem of online prediction for realtime camera planning, where the goal is to predict smooth trajectories that correctly track and frame objects of interest (e. g., players in a basketball game).
no code implementations • 4 Aug 2015 • Peter Carr, Roger Lee, Matthew Lorig
We show how to price and replicate a variety of barrier-style claims written on the $\log$ price $X$ and quadratic variation $\langle X \rangle$ of a risky asset.
no code implementations • CVPR 2013 • Patrick Lucey, Alina Bialkowski, Peter Carr, Stuart Morgan, Iain Matthews, Yaser Sheikh
In this paper, we describe a method to represent and discover adversarial group behavior in a continuous domain.
no code implementations • CVPR 2013 • Jingchen Liu, Peter Carr, Robert T. Collins, Yanxi Liu
Instead, we introduce a set of Game Context Features extracted from noisy detections to describe the current state of the match, such as how the players are spatially distributed.