Search Results for author:
Found 7 papers, 5 papers with code
Extract-and-Abstract: Unifying Extractive and Abstractive Summarization within Single Encoder-Decoder Framework
In this paper, we first introduce a parameter-free highlight method into the encoder-decoder framework: replacing the encoder attention mask with a saliency mask in the cross-attention module to force the decoder to focus only on salient parts of the input.
LLMs are not Zero-Shot Reasoners for Biomedical Information Extraction
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for applications in healthcare, reaching the performance of domain experts on tasks such as question answering and document summarisation.
Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation
In our work, we introduce an argument mining dataset that captures the end-to-end process of preparing an argumentative essay for a debate, which covers the tasks of claim and evidence identification (Task 1 ED), evidence convincingness ranking (Task 2 ECR), argumentative essay summarisation and human preference ranking (Task 3 ASR) and metric learning for automated evaluation of resulting essays, based on human feedback along argument quality dimensions (Task 4 SQE).
PULSAR at MEDIQA-Sum 2023: Large Language Models Augmented by Synthetic Dialogue Convert Patient Dialogues to Medical Records
This paper describes PULSAR, our system submission at the ImageClef 2023 MediQA-Sum task on summarising patient-doctor dialogues into clinical records.
PULSAR: Pre-training with Extracted Healthcare Terms for Summarising Patients' Problems and Data Augmentation with Black-box Large Language Models
Medical progress notes play a crucial role in documenting a patient's hospital journey, including his or her condition, treatment plan, and any updates for healthcare providers.
Exploring the Value of Pre-trained Language Models for Clinical Named Entity Recognition
The experimental outcomes show that 1) CRF layers improved all language models; 2) referring to BIO-strict span level evaluation using macro-average F1 score, although the fine-tuned LLMs achieved 0. 83+ scores, the TransformerCRF model trained from scratch achieved 0. 78+, demonstrating comparable performances with much lower cost - e. g. with 39. 80\% less training parameters; 3) referring to BIO-strict span-level evaluation using weighted-average F1 score, ClinicalBERT-CRF, BERT-CRF, and TransformerCRF exhibited lower score differences, with 97. 59\%/97. 44\%/96. 84\% respectively.
EDU-level Extractive Summarization with Varying Summary Lengths
To fill these gaps, this paper first conducts the comparison analysis of oracle summaries based on EDUs and sentences, which provides evidence from both theoretical and experimental perspectives to justify and quantify that EDUs make summaries with higher automatic evaluation scores than sentences.
