Search Results for author: Zhan Lu

Found 6 papers, 3 papers with code

MoE-Gen: High-Throughput MoE Inference on a Single GPU with Module-Based Batching

no code implementations12 Mar 2025 Tairan Xu, Leyang Xue, Zhan Lu, Adrian Jackson, Luo Mai

This paper presents MoE-Gen, a high-throughput MoE inference system optimized for single-GPU execution.

MoE-CAP: Benchmarking Cost, Accuracy and Performance of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Systems

no code implementations10 Dec 2024 Yao Fu, Yinsicheng Jiang, Yeqi Huang, Ping Nie, Zhan Lu, Leyang Xue, Congjie He, Man-Kit Sit, Jilong Xue, Li Dong, Ziming Miao, Kai Zou, Edoardo Ponti, Luo Mai

Its key innovation is a sparsity-aware CAP analysis model, the first to integrate cost, performance, and accuracy metrics into a single diagram while estimating the impact of sparsity on system performance.

Benchmarking Mixture-of-Experts

Spin-UP: Spin Light for Natural Light Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo

1 code implementation CVPR 2024 Zongrui Li, Zhan Lu, Haojie Yan, Boxin Shi, Gang Pan, Qian Zheng, Xudong Jiang

Natural Light Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo (NaUPS) relieves the strict environment and light assumptions in classical Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo (UPS) methods.

Inverse Rendering

MoE-Infinity: Efficient MoE Inference on Personal Machines with Sparsity-Aware Expert Cache

2 code implementations25 Jan 2024 Leyang Xue, Yao Fu, Zhan Lu, Luo Mai, Mahesh Marina

This paper presents MoE-Infinity, an efficient MoE inference system designed for personal machines with limited GPU memory capacity.

model

Pano-NeRF: Synthesizing High Dynamic Range Novel Views with Geometry from Sparse Low Dynamic Range Panoramic Images

1 code implementation26 Dec 2023 Zhan Lu, Qian Zheng, Boxin Shi, Xudong Jiang

However, in the case of inputting sparse Low Dynamic Range (LDR) panoramic images, NeRF often degrades with under-constrained geometry and is unable to reconstruct HDR radiance from LDR inputs.

HDR Reconstruction Lighting Estimation +1

NTIRE 2022 Challenge on High Dynamic Range Imaging: Methods and Results

no code implementations25 May 2022 Eduardo Pérez-Pellitero, Sibi Catley-Chandar, Richard Shaw, Aleš Leonardis, Radu Timofte, Zexin Zhang, Cen Liu, Yunbo Peng, Yue Lin, Gaocheng Yu, Jin Zhang, Zhe Ma, Hongbin Wang, Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Haiwei Wu, Lin Liu, Chao Dong, Jiantao Zhou, Qingsen Yan, Song Zhang, Weiye Chen, Yuhang Liu, Zhen Zhang, Yanning Zhang, Javen Qinfeng Shi, Dong Gong, Dan Zhu, Mengdi Sun, Guannan Chen, Yang Hu, Haowei Li, Baozhu Zou, Zhen Liu, Wenjie Lin, Ting Jiang, Chengzhi Jiang, Xinpeng Li, Mingyan Han, Haoqiang Fan, Jian Sun, Shuaicheng Liu, Juan Marín-Vega, Michael Sloth, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Richard Röttger, Chunyang Li, Long Bao, Gang He, Ziyao Xu, Li Xu, Gen Zhan, Ming Sun, Xing Wen, Junlin Li, Shuang Feng, Fei Lei, Rui Liu, Junxiang Ruan, Tianhong Dai, Wei Li, Zhan Lu, Hengyan Liu, Peian Huang, Guangyu Ren, Yonglin Luo, Chang Liu, Qiang Tu, Fangya Li, Ruipeng Gang, Chenghua Li, Jinjing Li, Sai Ma, Chenming Liu, Yizhen Cao, Steven Tel, Barthelemy Heyrman, Dominique Ginhac, Chul Lee, Gahyeon Kim, Seonghyun Park, An Gia Vien, Truong Thanh Nhat Mai, Howoon Yoon, Tu Vo, Alexander Holston, Sheir Zaheer, Chan Y. Park

The challenge is composed of two tracks with an emphasis on fidelity and complexity constraints: In Track 1, participants are asked to optimize objective fidelity scores while imposing a low-complexity constraint (i. e. solutions can not exceed a given number of operations).

Image Restoration Vocal Bursts Intensity Prediction

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.