no code implementations • 2 Jul 2020 • Boyang Lyu, Thao Pham, Giles Blaney, Zachary Haga, Angelo Sassaroli, Sergio Fantini, Shuchin Aeron
Results: In a sample of six subjects, G-W resulted in an alignment accuracy of 68 $\pm$ 4 % (weighted mean $\pm$ standard error) for session-by-session alignment, FG-W resulted in an alignment accuracy of 55 $\pm$ 2 % for subject-by-subject alignment.