CNN-based Approaches For Cross-Subject Classification in Motor Imagery: From The State-of-The-Art to DynamicNet

17 May 2021  ·  Alberto Zancanaro, Giulia Cisotto, João Ruivo Paulo, Gabriel Pires, Urbano J. Nunes ·

Motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are being increasingly employed to provide alternative means of communication and control for people suffering from neuro-motor impairments, with a special effort to bring these systems out of the controlled lab environments. Hence, accurately classifying MI from brain signals, e.g., from electroencephalography (EEG), is essential to obtain reliable BCI systems. However, MI classification is still a challenging task, because the signals are characterized by poor SNR, high intra-subject and cross-subject variability. Deep learning approaches have started to emerge as valid alternatives to standard machine learning techniques, e.g., filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP), to extract subject-independent features and to increase the cross-subject classification performance of MI BCI systems. In this paper, we first present a review of the most recent studies using deep learning for MI classification, with particular attention to their cross-subject performance. Second, we propose DynamicNet, a Python-based tool for quick and flexible implementations of deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks. We show-case the potentiality of DynamicNet by implementing EEGNet, a well-established architecture for effective EEG classification. Finally, we compare its performance with FBCSP in a 4-class MI classification over public datasets. To explore its cross-subject classification ability, we applied three different cross-validation schemes. From our results, we demonstrate that DynamicNet-implemented EEGNet outperforms FBCSP by about 25%, with a statistically significant difference when cross-subject validation schemes are applied.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here