Comparison of retinal regions-of-interest imaged by OCT for the classification of intermediate AMD

To study whether it is possible to differentiate intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from healthy controls using partial optical coherence tomography (OCT) data, that is, restricting the input B-scans to certain pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs). A total of 15744 B-scans from 269 intermediate AMD patients and 115 normal subjects were used in this study (split on subject level in 80% train, 10% validation and 10% test). From each OCT B-scan, three ROIs were extracted: retina, complex between retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch membrane (BM), and choroid (CHO). These ROIs were obtained using two different methods: masking and cropping. In addition to the six ROIs, the whole OCT B-scan and the binary mask corresponding to the segmentation of the RPE-BM complex were used. For each subset, a convolutional neural network (based on VGG16 architecture and pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained and tested. The performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. All trained models presented an AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity equal to or higher than 0.884, 0.816, 0.685, and 0.644, respectively. The model trained on the whole OCT B-scan presented the best performance (AUROC = 0.983, accuracy = 0.927, sensitivity = 0.862, specificity = 0.913). The models trained on the ROIs obtained with the cropping method led to significantly higher outcomes than those obtained with masking, with the exception of the retinal tissue, where no statistically significant difference was observed between cropping and masking (p = 0.47). This study demonstrated that while using the complete OCT B-scan provided the highest accuracy in classifying intermediate AMD, models trained on specific ROIs such as the RPE-BM complex or the choroid can still achieve high performance.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here