Counterexamples to "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei

17 Jan 2020  ·  Elizabeth L. Ogburn, Ilya Shpitser, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen ·

This note has been updated (April, 2020) to respond to "Towards Clarifying the Theory of the Deconfounder" by Yixin Wang, David M. Blei (arXiv:2003.04948). This original note, posted in January, 2020, is meant to complement our previous comment on "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei (2019). We provide a more succinct and transparent explanation of the fact that the deconfounder does not control for multi-cause confounding. The argument given in Wang and Blei (2019) makes two mistakes: (1) attempting to infer independence conditional on one variable from independence conditional on a different, unrelated variable, and (2) attempting to infer joint independence from pairwise independence. We give two simple counterexamples to the deconfounder claim.

PDF Abstract

Code
Add Remove Mark official

No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Tasks
Add Remove

Datasets

  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper
Add Remove

  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods
Add Remove

No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here
Contact us on: hello@paperswithcode.com . Papers With Code is a free resource with all data licensed under CC-BY-SA.
Terms Data policy Cookies policy