Deep Learning of Partial Graph Matching via Differentiable Top-K

CVPR 2023  ยท  Runzhong Wang, Ziao Guo, Shaofei Jiang, Xiaokang Yang, Junchi Yan ยท

Graph matching (GM) aims at discovering node matching between graphs, by maximizing the node- and edge-wise affinities between the matched elements. As an NP-hard problem, its challenge is further pronounced in the existence of outlier nodes in both graphs which is ubiquitous in practice, especially for vision problems. However, popular affinity-maximization-based paradigms often lack a principled scheme to suppress the false matching and resort to handcrafted thresholding to dismiss the outliers. This limitation is also inherited by the neural GM solvers though they have shown superior performance in the ideal no-outlier setting. In this paper, we propose to formulate the partial GM problem as the top-k selection task with a given/estimated number of inliers k. Specifically, we devise a differentiable top-k module that enables effective gradient descent over the optimal-transport layer, which can be readily plugged into SOTA deep GM pipelines including the quadratic matching network NGMv2 as well as the linear matching network GCAN. Meanwhile, the attention-fused aggregation layers are developed to estimate k to enable automatic outlier-robust matching in the wild. Last but not least, we remake and release a new benchmark called IMC-PT-SparseGM, originating from the IMC-PT stereo-matching dataset. The new benchmark involves more scale-varying graphs and partial matching instances from the real world. Experiments show that our methods outperform other partial matching schemes on popular benchmarks.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Introduced in the Paper:

IMCPT-SparseGM-100 IMCPT-SparseGM-50

Used in the Paper:

PASCAL VOC

Results from the Paper


 Ranked #1 on Graph Matching on Willow Object Class (F1 score metric)

     Get a GitHub badge
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Benchmark
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 PCA-GM F1 score 0.575 # 6
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 GCAN-AFAT-U F1 score 0.715 # 1
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 GCAN-AFAT-I F1 score 0.709 # 2
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 NGMv2-AFAT-U F1 score 0.703 # 3
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 NGMv2-AFAT-I F1 score 0.701 # 4
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-100 NGMv2 F1 score 0.676 # 5
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 GCAN-AFAT-I F1 score 0.729 # 1
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 PCA-GM F1 score 0.631 # 6
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 NGMv2 F1 score 0.703 # 5
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 NGMv2-AFAT-U F1 score 0.720 # 3
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 NGMv2-AFAT-I F1 score 0.728 # 2
Graph Matching IMCPT-SparseGM-50 GCAN-AFAT-U F1 score 0.711 # 4
Graph Matching PASCAL VOC NGMv2-AFAT-I F1 score 0.599 # 9
Graph Matching PASCAL VOC NGMv2-AFAT-U F1 score 0.602 # 7
Graph Matching PASCAL VOC GCAN-AFAT-U F1 score 0.620 # 4
Graph Matching PASCAL VOC GCAN-AFAT-I F1 score 0.616 # 5
Graph Matching Willow Object Class NGMv2-AFAT-U F1 score 0.817 # 4
Graph Matching Willow Object Class GCAN-AFAT-I F1 score 0.837 # 1
Graph Matching Willow Object Class GCAN-AFAT-U F1 score 0.823 # 3
Graph Matching Willow Object Class NGMv2-AFAT-I F1 score 0.831 # 2

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here