Efficient Representative Subset Selection over Sliding Windows

15 Jun 2017  ·  Yanhao Wang, Yuchen Li, Kian-Lee Tan ·

Representative subset selection (RSS) is an important tool for users to draw insights from massive datasets. Existing literature models RSS as the submodular maximization problem to capture the "diminishing returns" property of the representativeness of selected subsets, but often only has a single constraint (e.g., cardinality), which limits its applications in many real-world problems. To capture the data recency issue and support different types of constraints, we formulate dynamic RSS in data streams as maximizing submodular functions subject to general $d$-knapsack constraints (SMDK) over sliding windows. We propose a \textsc{KnapWindow} framework (KW) for SMDK. KW utilizes the \textsc{KnapStream} algorithm (KS) for SMDK in append-only streams as a subroutine. It maintains a sequence of checkpoints and KS instances over the sliding window. Theoretically, KW is $\frac{1-\varepsilon}{1+d}$-approximate for SMDK. Furthermore, we propose a \textsc{KnapWindowPlus} framework (KW$^{+}$) to improve upon KW. KW$^{+}$ builds an index \textsc{SubKnapChk} to manage the checkpoints and KS instances. \textsc{SubKnapChk} deletes a checkpoint whenever it can be approximated by its successors. By keeping much fewer checkpoints, KW$^{+}$ achieves higher efficiency than KW while still guaranteeing a $\frac{1-\varepsilon'}{2+2d}$-approximate solution for SMDK. Finally, we evaluate the efficiency and solution quality of KW and KW$^{+}$ in real-world datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that KW achieves more than two orders of magnitude speedups over the batch baseline and preserves high-quality solutions for SMDK over sliding windows. KW$^{+}$ further runs 5-10 times faster than KW while providing solutions with equivalent or even better utilities.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here