Escaping Saddle Points for Effective Generalization on Class-Imbalanced Data

28 Dec 2022  ยท  Harsh Rangwani, Sumukh K Aithal, Mayank Mishra, R. Venkatesh Babu ยท

Real-world datasets exhibit imbalances of varying types and degrees. Several techniques based on re-weighting and margin adjustment of loss are often used to enhance the performance of neural networks, particularly on minority classes. In this work, we analyze the class-imbalanced learning problem by examining the loss landscape of neural networks trained with re-weighting and margin-based techniques. Specifically, we examine the spectral density of Hessian of class-wise loss, through which we observe that the network weights converge to a saddle point in the loss landscapes of minority classes. Following this observation, we also find that optimization methods designed to escape from saddle points can be effectively used to improve generalization on minority classes. We further theoretically and empirically demonstrate that Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), a recent technique that encourages convergence to a flat minima, can be effectively used to escape saddle points for minority classes. Using SAM results in a 6.2\% increase in accuracy on the minority classes over the state-of-the-art Vector Scaling Loss, leading to an overall average increase of 4\% across imbalanced datasets. The code is available at: https://github.com/val-iisc/Saddle-LongTail.

PDF Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ฯ=100) PaCo + SAM Error Rate 47.0 # 20
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ฯ=100) GLMC + SAM Error Rate 40.99 # 6
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ฯ=200) PaCo + SAM Error Rate 52.0 # 1
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ฯ=50) GLMC + SAM Error Rate 34.72 # 5
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ฯ=10) LDAM + DRW + SAM Error Rate 10.6 # 28
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ฯ=100) GLMC + SAM Error Rate 10.82 # 2
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ฯ=200) LDAM + DRW + SAM Error Rate 21.9 # 1
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ฯ=50) GLMC + SAM Error Rate 8.44 # 1
Long-tail Learning ImageNet-LT LDAM + DRW + SAM Top-1 Accuracy 53.1 # 40
Long-tail Learning iNaturalist 2018 LDAM + DRW + SAM Top-1 Accuracy 70.1 # 30

Results from Other Papers


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Rank Source Paper Compare
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-100-LT (ฯ=100) VS + SAM Error Rate 53.4 # 38
Long-tail Learning CIFAR-10-LT (ฯ=100) VS + SAM Error Rate 17.6 # 15

Methods